Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell, and TotalEnergies have paid back just 5% of the €13 trillion in societal and environmental debt.


Oil Companies Have Trillions in Unpaid Health & Environmental Debt

BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell, and TotalEnergies have paid back just 5% of the €13 trillion in societal and environmental debt.

Europe’s five biggest oil majors pocketed €47 billion — mostly in profit for shareholders and management — in 2021, taking their total profits to €850 billion since 1993, a new study into Big Oil’s unpaid societal and environmental debt shows.

The study, carried out by Profundo on behalf of T&E, shows that BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell and TotalEnergies are responsible for huge societal costs through pollution, deteriorating public health and carbon emissions, totalling a whopping €13 trillion. They have paid back a mere 5% of this in corporate taxes, the study reveals, leaving a mountain of unpaid costs at the door of society. With fuel prices at record highs and consumers facing a cost of living crisis, now is the time for the oil companies to pay back, says T&E.

Sofie Defour, climate manager at T&E, said: “While oil majors’ shareholders and managers have pocketed nearly a trillion euros over the past 30 years, they have left destruction in their wake. And it is ordinary people who are paying for it. With fuel prices soaring, it’s time for Big Oil to pay back its debt to society.”

The Rio Summit in 1992 was the first time that countries agreed to act on sustainable development and by this time there was no doubt that oil companies were fully aware of their impact on the planet. T&E has therefore used the years since as a timeframe for Big Oil’s debt to society using a number of measures.

The study finds that between 1993 and 2020:

  • Europe’s five biggest oil producers have been responsible for around 13% of global CO2-equivalent emissions¹.
  • The five oil companies were responsible for an estimated €9 trillion in unpaid health costs from air pollution.
  • They were responsible for unpaid carbon costs of an estimated €4.2 trillion².
  • Unpaid damage would be far higher when the costs of deforestation, human rights and indigenous population destruction are taken into account.

Shareholders and management were the major beneficiaries of this lack of societal responsibility. Between 1993 and 2020, €622 billion was distributed to the shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks. Managers of these five companies made over €2 billion in this timeframe. With soaring energy prices this year, shareholder and management profits will have grown significantly.

The oil majors have paid back a meagre 5% of the €13 trillion in societal damage through corporate taxes. In comparison, fuel taxes that are paid for by drivers at the pumps were in some cases over three times larger than the corporate tax paid by the five companies. Consumers have therefore been paying for external costs like health and pollution, while the oil majors have lined their pockets.

As Europeans face rising inflation — particularly at the pumps — Big Oil continues to profit. T&E calls on governments to help to alleviate the cost of living crisis and for oil companies to pay for the pollution they are responsible for.

For years Big Oil has sought to control the conversation on climate change legislation with Europe’s oil majors spending almost €4 billion worldwide in lobbying and an additional €3 billion in advertisements since 1993, the study shows.

Sofie Defour concludes: “This is not just about fairness. Big Oil is increasingly trying to dictate the pace of climate change mitigation. They seek to portray themselves as key actors in the transition by spending huge sums of money on lobbying and advertisements. Yet a legacy of unpaid oil debt shows that they are only interested in profits. Politicians must close their doors to Big Oil.”

¹ From scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions refer to the emissions associated with the fuel that is burnt, for which companies should take full responsibility and disclose. When companies trade oil, this will also contribute to their scope 3 emissions, but this also means that there is double counting of the emissions.

² In various jurisdictions, carbon costs have been introduced. These costs form the start of a mechanism of pricing of externalities and to use the market price to reduce GHG emissions by companies and/or industries. Industries generate Scope 1 (operations), Scope 2 (sourcing) and Scope 3 (the use of the products sold) emissions. Fuel for cars, trucks, shipping, and all other road vehicles has to date not been included in the EU’s carbon tax. This means the majority of the oil majors’ emissions have not been included in the main carbon emission pricing mechanism. The study therefore estimates how much the companies should have paid in carbon taxes if all of their emissions were to be included in the EU’s carbon market.

This article was previously published by Transport & Environment.

The study: Download the report

Big Oil’s historical debt uncovered

The Rio Summit in 1992 was the first time that countries decided to act on development and the environment. However, since then the activities of the European five Big Oil companies (BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell, and TotalEnergies) have resulted into enormous societal costs through pollution, deteriorating public health and carbon emissions.

On behalf of T&E, the research institute Profundo has quantified the profits of the five oil majors since 1993 and their unpaid health and environmental costs.

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Electrifying Industrial Heat for Steel, Cement, & More

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!

Transport & Environment’s (T&E) vision is a zero-emission mobility system that is affordable and has minimal impacts on our health, climate and environment. Created over 30 years ago, we have shaped some of Europe’s most important environmental laws.


You May Also Like

Climate Change

Scope 3 emissions account for 95% of all greenhouse gases released by Shell, but the company doesn't want to talk about them.

Clean Transport

Shell will, more likely than not, have big challenges staying anywhere near its current size as the world transitions to. electric vehicles. But it...

Clean Power

T&E welcomes self-sufficiency targets for battery raw materials and production goals for clean tech. The EU today unveiled two draft laws in response to...

Clean Power

Shell takes another step on its green hydrogen journey, while ExxonMobil doubles down on natural gas with carbon capture.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.