Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
IPCC 6
Image credit: IPCC

Climate Change

5 Takeaways From The April IPCC 6 Report

The IPCC 6 Third Assessment is out. It’s not good news.

The latest IPCC 6 report released this week is 3000 pages long. Fortunately for our readers, we don’t intend to copy and paste them all here! All we can do is share some of the highlights and leave you to fill in the spaces on your own. Let’s start with a tweet from Bill McKibben, who has just returned home after accepting the prestigious Congressional Medal of Distinction.

If you have to condense 3000 pages into a nutshell, that’s a pretty good start. Antonio Gutterres, Secretary General of the United Nations was equally succinct. In a tweet, he said, “The latest IPCC report is a litany of broken climate promises. Some government & business leaders are saying one thing, but doing another. They are lying. It is time to stop burning our planet.” He adds, “Investing in new fossil fuels is moral and economic madness.”

Greta Thunberg also had something to say about this latest report. “When reading the new IPCC report, keep in mind that science is cautious and this has been watered down by nations in negotiations. Many seem more focused on giving false hope to those causing the problem rather than telling the blunt truth that would give us a chance to act.” For more on the fight to water down the report, see this illuminating report from The Guardian.

What Should We Learn From IPCC 6?

Christiana Figueres is from Costa Rica, a nation that is doing more to address its carbon emissions. She was deeply involved in the negotiations leading to the Paris Climate Accords of 2015. Speaking with Bloomberg Green, she had this to say about the new IPCC 6 report.

“I don’t have words to explain. “Concerning” is not enough. This is frankly a terrifying report. It’s not really about megatons. It is fundamentally about the long term well being of the entire web of life on this planet.

“It was quite foreseeable that the report would underline, yet again, that we are not doing enough, neither in terms of scale or speed. This decade continues to be the decisive decade to have half a chance to close the warming gap. We are far from being below 2° C, let alone 1.5° C. Beyond that, adaptation would be in serious question. It could trigger the point beyond which ecosystems will simply transform irreversibly.

“I’m lacking words for this. It’s beyond immoral. It’s suicidal. What is suicidal is our inability to take the decisions and enact the behavioral changes that we perfectly well can in order to align our planet with the Paris Agreement. That’s the problem. There is nothing new that any report can tell us about what we should be doing. The gap that we identified years ago is not closing; in fact, it’s enlarging. That’s the news. It’s tragic.”

The Takeaway

Had we heeded the warnings about the danger of burning fossil fuels when they first started back in the 1950s, we wouldn’t be talking about global heating today because there wouldn’t be any. But we didn’t. Had we started taking things seriously when the Kyoto climate conference was held in 1997, we wouldn’t be having this conversation today. But we didn’t. Had we honored the commitment made in Paris in 2015, the situation today would not be so dire. But we didn’t.

The race is on to drill for more oil and gas and dig more coal as a result of the Russian attack on Ukraine because heaven forfend that we alter our lifestyle one iota to help slow down the climate change juggernaut. Americans in particular are wringing their hands in horror now that it costs well north of a hundred bucks to fill the gas tanks of their Suburbans and Stupid Duty pickup trucks. They are like Slim Pickens riding the bomb down to the ground at the end of Dr. Strangelove, smiling all the way.

 

The message is clear. We must stop burning fossil fuels or destroy the ability of human beings to survive on Planet Earth. Do we understand that? Do we get it? Will we ever awaken from this nightmare and do the right thing?

Nope. Not in this lifetime and not in this world. We are having too much fun and are drunk on the power that burning fossil fuels gives us. We won’t stop any more than an alcoholic or junkie will give up booze or drugs. The future is too damn scary to face sober, so let it rip and let God pick up the pieces.

Yee Haw!

 
Check out our brand new E-Bike Guide. If you're curious about electric bikes, this is the best place to start your e-mobility journey!
 
 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Advertisement
 
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his homes in Florida and Connecticut or anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. You can follow him on Twitter but not on any social media platforms run by evil overlords like Facebook.

Comments

You May Also Like

Agriculture

Climate change has already affected livestock production, both directly through heat stress affecting animal mortality and productivity and indirectly through effects on grassland, species...

Clean Power

Renewable energy is a viable and vital alternative to fossil fuels, and we must share information about renewable energy's power and promise with others...

Clean Power

Biodiversity is the diversity of life from the level of gene to the level of the ecosystem. The newest IPCC report cites the value...

Fossil Fuels

A climate scientist explains the connection between fossil fuels and war.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.