Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Transport

California Introducing Annual $100 Fee For Zero-Emission Vehicle Owners … In 2020

The California state legislature has passed a new $52.4 billion bill known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) that will see owners of zero-emissions vehicles charged an annual fee of $100. The charge is intended to offset the gasoline taxes that zero-emissions vehicle owners don’t pay, but that’s not all.

The California state legislature has passed a new $52.4 billion bill known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) that will see owners of zero-emissions vehicles charged an annual fee of $100. The charge is intended to offset the gasoline taxes that zero-emissions vehicle owners don’t pay, but that’s not all.

The new $100 annual fee for zero-emissions vehicles won’t be imposed until 2020. However, starting in 2018, all vehicle owners will be charged a variable annual fee of between $25 and $175 — variable depending on vehicle value. According to Governor Jerry Brown, this range was chosen since it will likely end up being less than comparable repair costs resulting from driving on damaged roads.

In addition to that charge, the SB1 bill also introduces a $0.12-per-gallon gasoline tax increase — which is intended to account for inflation (the tax was last increased in 1994). In total, the new state gasoline tax will total 30¢ per gallon. It will take effect on November 1, 2017.

“Unlike the practice in previous years, this one is to be used only for improvements to the transportation infrastructure, to begin cutting into an estimated $130 billion backlog of repairs and expansions,”  Green Car Reports highlights. “The new fees and increased taxes will amount to $52.4 billion over 10 years, according to an article in the Sacramento Bee.”

Going on: “Trying to cast the increase in a brighter light, officials say this time the money will go where it is intended — to pay for road repairs — because they have fixed the ‘leak,’ in which the funds collected were used for non-transportation projects. Now that the bill has been approved, it’s up to civic groups and the tax-paying drivers to ensure the state remains accountable for spending the $5.24 billion annual fund in smart ways.”

Do any Californians here want to make a comment on the coming changes?

Photo by Kyle Field | CleanTechnica

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

Despite widespread, intense drought conditions, hydroelectric power plants in the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), the grid operator for most of the state, provided...

Cars

California is the leading electric vehicle state in the US both for the total number of EVs and public EV chargers, so it’s not...

Agriculture

Electrifying One Medium-Sized Tractor in California Reduces Carbon Emissions by as Much as Replacing 45 Cars with EVs

Cars

As Aptera moves its way through the development process and toward production, the company knows that its current facility just isn’t going to be...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.