Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

Utility-Scale Solar’s Impact On The Land

Originally published on the ECOreport

The joint study from Stanford University and UC Riverside reads like a report card. The authors recognized that “solar energy has one of the greatest climate change mitigation potentials” of all renewable energy sources. It can play a leading role in helping the United States reach its goal of reducing emissions to 80% of 1990 greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This would require covering a great deal of land surface. Rebecca R. Hernandez et al examined more than 160 sites in California to determine utility-scale solar’s impact on the land.

14007312101_c5ecd71e68_k-1038x561

U.S. Policy is the Reverse of Europe’s

The report found much that needs to be changed.

Current regulations and policies “deemphasized” solar development “within the built environment and near population centers in favor of development within shrublands and scrublands.”

This is the reverse of the situation in Europe. In Germany, for example, 90% of the solar installations are in developed lands. An Italian study found that 2/3 of US installations are in “environmentally unsuitable” lands “with adverse implications for land cover change-related CO2 emissions.”

Screen-Shot-2015-10-26-at-7.34.18-AM

Incompatible Installations

“A large portion” of the “incapable” Californian  installations they studied are “sited far from existing transmission infrastructure.” This is both expensive and “difficult to site due to social and environmental concerns.”

13557605485_24483a14d1_k

” … Development decisions may overlook environmental resources unprotected by policies but valued by interest groups [e.g., important bird areas, essential connectivity areas, vulnerability of caliche (i.e., mineralized carbon) in desert soils, biodiversity hot spots, percent habitat loss].”

Scrublands contain “diverse recreational opportunities, culturally and historically significant landscapes, movement corridors for wildlife, groundwater as a drinking source, and carbon (sequestration) …”

These are “biologically rich” areas,  “known for high levels of species richness,” which have already lost “70% or more of the original extent of vegetation … due to global environmental change-type threats, including land cover change.”

In addition to sites on scrubland and shrubland, almost a third of the installations were on agricultural land where, “The growing demand for food, affordable housing, water, and electricity puts considerable pressure on available land resources, making recent land use decisions in this region a noteworthy case study for understanding the food– energy–water nexus that should be explored.”

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Compatible Installations

Hernandez et al also found that there are many “compatible” utility-scale solar installations in California. They range between 20 MW and 200 MW in capacity and, aside from the much publicized facility in Yolo County, are “located within the Central Valley and inland southern California regions.”

Though the report does not specifically mention brownfield areas, the EPA previously identified over 10,000 U.S. sites with the potential to install a 300-kilowatt solar array or greater. These are contaminated areas where there would be no environmental damage and presumably few conflicts with local residents.

Hernandez et al did recommend urban solar:

“Siting USSE installations in places already impacted by humans (e.g., parking lots, rooftops) reduces the likelihood that adverse environmental impacts will occur and can exceed generation demands for renewable energy goals in places with moderate- to high-quality solar resources, including California.”

PV solar installations within developed areas “could meet California’s total energy demand 4.8 … times over …”  Concentrated Solar Power could produce 2.7 times the state’s needs.

Photo Credits: Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) from Pacific Southwest Region USFWS via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); Fig. 2. Number of photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) installations (planned, under construction, operating) by land cover type in California; represented in order of most installations to least for both technologies. – Solar energy development impacts on land cover change and protected areas, Rebecca R. Hernandez et al; Ivanpah electric power generation station by Bill & Vicki T via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); Example of a Compatible Installation from Yolo County, Courtesy Yolo County General Services

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

is the President of Cortes Community Radio , CKTZ 89.5 FM, where he has hosted a half hour program since 2014, and editor of the Cortes Currents (formerly the ECOreport), a website dedicated to exploring how our lifestyle choices and technologies affect the West Coast of British Columbia. He writes for both writes for both Clean Technica and PlanetSave on Important Media. He is a research junkie who has written over 2,000 articles since he was first published in 1982. Roy lives on Cortes Island, BC, Canada.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

I recently wrote about Stanford University’s commitment to go 100% renewable when it comes to electricity. The university claimed to be the “first research...

Batteries

Universities are suppose to be the homes of our best and brightest. (Don’t look here.) They are supposed to be about the long-term view....

Clean Power

California has more solar power installed than any other state — by far. It is also first in terms of percentage of the state’s...

Clean Power

Courtesy of NRDC By Mohit Chhabra and Julia de Lamare California leads the nation in fighting climate change because of state policies that have...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.