Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Solyndra Misled DOE, Investigation Finds

Originally published on Solar Love.

The Department of Energy (DOE) published a special report in late August of 2015 about a 4-year investigation into Solyndra’s application process that led to the thin-film solar company’s securing of a huge DOE loan.


The report is here, if you prefer to go directly to it.

The inquiry found that Solyndra did not apply to the loan program in the most ethical manner. “Our investigation confirmed that during the loan guarantee application process and while drawing down loan proceeds, Solyndra provided the Department with statements, assertions, and certifications that were inaccurate and misleading, misrepresented known facts, and, in some instances, omitted information that was highly relevant to key decisions in the process to award and execute the $535 million loan guarantee. In our view, the investigative record suggests that the actions of certain Solyndra officials were, at best, reckless and irresponsible or, at worst, an orchestrated effort to knowingly and intentionally deceive and mislead the Department,” the report stated

Federal officials who worked with Solyndra during the application process were on the hook too, though to a lesser degree. The report findings stated that they did not conduct due diligence and could have been more careful when they were receiving information from Solyndra, and reviewed it more closely.

Solyndra shut down in 2011, but the loan application took place in 2006. The federal loan was won in 2009. In 2010, President Obama visited the Solyndra plant in California.

In 2015, all of this information might seem like very old news. The investigation and report are significant, however, in that they seem to dispel the political discourse that was flying around when the incident or “scandal” was first reported.

A New York Times journalist wrote a succinct description of some of the 2011 maneuvers: “For an hour and a half on Friday morning, they peppered the two men with questions about this ‘taxpayer ripoff,’ as Representative Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, described it, knowing full well that Harrison and Stover would invoke their constitutional right to remain silent.”

Attempting to turn the Solyndra failure into a Democratic failure was wrong, because you could say that the Solyndra loan resulted from the policy efforts of both Bush and Obama. The bill that Bush signed in 2005 was amended for the 2009 stimulus bill signed by Obama,

“The recovery act amended the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to create section 1705 for ‘commercially available technologies,’ as the Energy Department explains on page 12 of a 2009 report on stimulus funding. The stimulus provided more funding for the loan guarantee programs. The loans under the new program also came with no credit subsidy fees, making them more attractive and less expensive than those under the program signed into law by President Bush. It was under this program that Solyndra was able to get financing, although the company initially applied under the section 1703 program.”

One unfortunate effect of the Solyndra situation was the misleading impression that government support for solar power was a waste of money. In fact, the Department of Energy has had a number of success stories as well, and the overall program has been a wild success.

Another thing worth mentioning is that about 75% of venture-backed startups fail, so it isn’t realistic or fair to expect that 100% of the ones that receive government funding should be infallible. This DOE program’s failure rate has just been a few percent — something any professional investor would be happy about!

Image Credit: Pedro Xing, Wiki Commons

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Hello, I have been writing online for some time, and enjoy the outdoors. If you like, you can follow me on Twitter:


You May Also Like

Clean Power

The massive new SunZia wind energy transmission line is closing in on the finish line, ESG or not.

Clean Power

Many people want to build new transmission lines for renewable energy like solar and wind. We dive into the issues, pro and con, on...


A primer on public loan guarantees, grants, and tax credits for US clean industrial projects.

Clean Transport

An ABB E-mobility press release passed my desk recently, and it caught my eye because I was a bit thrown off by the news....

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.