Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
Frackers have stricter chemical disclosure rules In Wyoming: According to a recent legal settlement, they will have to substantiate any trade secret claims.

Consumer Technology

Frackers Have Stricter Chemical Disclosure Rules In Wyoming

Frackers have stricter chemical disclosure rules In Wyoming: According to a recent legal settlement, they will have to substantiate any trade secret claims.

Originally Published on the ECOreport

There was a legal loophole when, in 2010, Wyoming became the first state to require the disclosure of chemicals used while fracking. Corporations did not have to reveal chemicals that were “trade secrets.” This qualification was too loose, and some chemicals have been linked to respiratory distress, rashes, convulsions, organ damage, and cancer. So Earthjustice, acting on the behalf of represented the Powder River Basin Resource Council, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Earthworks, and the Center for Effective Government, sued the state’s Oil and Gas Commission to demand more transparency. A settlement was reached on January 26, 2015, and now frackers have stricter chemical disclosure rules in Wyoming

Screenshot 2015-01-29 07.12.50

Use Of A Trade Secrets Exemption

According to Earthjustice’s press release, Wyoming’s Supreme Court ruled that:

    1. the Oil and Gas Commission has the burden of justifying the use of a trade secrets exemption and
    2. the definition of trade secrets under the Freedom of Information Act applies in Public Records Act cases, such as this one. In contrast, the Oil and Gas Commission wanted to use a broader definition of trade secrets, which would allow more withholding of chemical information from public disclosure and review.

“The settlement agreement is calculated to do is ensure that the commission has the information in front of it the information it needs to separate legitimate trade secret claims from illegitimate ones. The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed that the public’s right to know is paramount under state law. If fracking operators don’t want to reveal what chemicals they use, they will have to explain why they qualify as a trade secret, which means they shouldn’t be able to capriciously keep secrets from the public about dangerous chemicals,” said  Katherine O’Brien, an attorney with Earthjustice.

Screenshot 2015-01-29 06.52.18

FracFocus

A spokesperson for Halliburton, an industry intervenor in this case, told NGI‘s Shale Daily that, “the company supports disclosure of the ingredients used in hydraulic fracturing.”

“Halliburton has made ingredient information available on its website and helped to establish FracFocus, the registry providing public access to the substances used on a well-by-well basis,” the spokesperson said.

The usefulness of tools such as the website FracFocus depends on the transparency of the companies involved, the strength of state regulations, and the ability of state agencies to enforce those regulations. While some operators have been forthcoming, others are more recalcitrant. Homeowners and concerned citizens can use FracFocus to look up the chemicals used for specific wells, but it ceases to be effective if companies can withhold many of their chemical names by calling them “trade secrets.”

“Its’ usefulness really depends on how vigorous the public disclosure requirements are for the particular state or province that is using it,” said O’Brien.

Screenshot 2015-01-29 07.35.52

Posts Of All These Trade Secrets

She added,

Fortunately in Wyoming the Oil and Gas Commission posts all of these trade secrets requests and the supporting documentation. So what the public has done, our clients and others, is to review those requests, and the decisions, in order to make sure the commission is not granting confidentiality protection based on trades secrets status.

As a result of the settlement, companies will have to produce much more documentation when claiming trade secrets and it will easier to ascertain if the commission is acting properly when this is granted.

“This is a great step forward, in terms of public disclosure in Wyoming, but the proof will be how the Oil and Gas Commission implements these new policies and we’ll certainly be watching to make sure they do so properly,” said O’Brien.

Images Above:

 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

is the President of Cortes Community Radio , CKTZ 89.5 FM, where he has hosted a half hour program since 2014, and editor of the Cortes Currents (formerly the ECOreport), a website dedicated to exploring how our lifestyle choices and technologies affect the West Coast of British Columbia. He writes for both writes for both Clean Technica and PlanetSave on Important Media. He is a research junkie who has written over 2,000 articles since he was first published in 1982. Roy lives on Cortes Island, BC, Canada.

Comments

You May Also Like

Fossil Fuels

The EPA approved dangerous chemicals that break down into PFAS for use in fracking in 2011, according to records obtained by Physicians for Social...

Air Quality

Originally published by Union of Concerned Scientists, The Equation. By Rachel Cleetus, Policy Director This week, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Earthjustice, and the Center for...

Climate Change

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with PennEast Pipeline Company in its battle with the state of New Jersey over whether its federal permit...

Fossil Fuels

Among the known health risks caused by living near fracking wells, scientists are adding heart attacks to the list. A new study published in the Journal of...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.