Air Quality

Published on June 13th, 2013 | by Jake Richardson


$278 Million A Year In Geothermal Benefits For US

June 13th, 2013 by  

The annual health and environmental benefits to the United States from geothermal energy have been estimated to be $278 million a year, according to the Geothermal Energy Association. Binary geothermal energy plants produce almost no fossil fuel emissions, and other types only trace amounts of pollutants. Argonne National Laboratories found that hydrothermal binary plants have some of the lowest emissions of any energy technology, in their 2010 life-cycle emissions study. Most new geothermal plants that have recently come online in the US are this type.

Image Credit:Public Domain

Image Credit:Public Domain

Their analysis is titled Promoting Geothermal Energy: Air Emissions Comparison and Externality Analysis (21 pages, PDF) One of the more fascinating comments made in their report was one comparing geothermal emissions to coal’s, ‘Flash and dry steam plants emit about 5% of the carbon dioxide, 1% of the sulfur dioxide, and less than 1% of the nitrous oxide emitted by a coal-fired plant of equal energy capacity, and binarygeothermal plants produce near-zero emissions.’ (Source: Promoting Geothermal)

This comparison is especially noteworthy because coal’s air pollution has been estimated to cost the US $500 billion a year, by a Harvard study. While geothermal currently produces far less energy than coal in America, the benefits it is associated with for public health and reducing climate change might have actually been underestimated.

In 2010, geothermal provided less than one half of one percent of total US energy. (A Yale publication stated the US could generate five percent of its energy from geothermal by 2050.)

At this extremely low adoption rate, geothermal seems to very overlooked and yet it has great potential to provide reliable, clean energy. As more plants are built and more research is conducted, costs and efficiencies should become even more favorable. Current energy outputs could be increased while emissions remain low, so the value of geothermal to society would likely increase. The same could not be said of coal.

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.


About the Author

Hello, I have been writing online for some time, and enjoy the outdoors. If you like, you can follow me on Google Plus.

  • JamesWimberley

    The Yale estimate is very, very conservative. Here’s the MIT 2006 report on the potential of EGS:

    Using reasonable assumptions regarding how heat would be mined from stimulated EGS reservoirs, we also estimated the extractable portion to exceed 200,000 EJ or about 2,000 times the annual consumption of primary energy in the United States in 2005.

    There is more than enough geothermal energy to power the planet. It’s safe, unobtrusive and 24/7/12 reliable – better than anything else available. The question is of course cost, which is an endogenous variable at the 2050 horizon There are signs Energy Secretary Moniz will at last back the struggling EGS pioneers with some serious research money. Traditional hydrothermal power is growing steadily, but its potential is limited outside a few regions.

  • jburt56

    Geothermal is a great way to provide 24/7 power. Can you DIG it??

    • Bob_Wallace

      Geothermal is also dispatchable. Unlike other thermal generation like gas, coal and nuclear which can take hours to day to heat back up, geothermal keeps itself hot and ready.

Back to Top ↑