Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



Fox News Likes Low-Cost Electric Vehicle Technology

Not that they’re going soft on us, but Fox recently featured an article on low-cost electric vehicle technology, and it’s just the kind of news we like to see here at CleanTechnica: good news about emerging clean technology that could break through the affordability barrier.

The article profiled a company called Simbol Materials, which is working on a low-cost lithium production process that could cut the retail price of electric vehicles down to the bone. But that’s not even the part that caught our attention….

Fox News runs positive story on low cost electric vehicles

We Built This!

The article provides a good rundown of Simbol’s low-cost process for extracting lithium from saltwater, which could then be used to lower the cost of batteries for electric vehicles.

But here’s what caught our eye: beyond giving Simbol credit for starting up a promising cleantech project, the article also takes care to credit the taxpayer-funded facilities where the process was developed, right up front in the second paragraph:

“The salt water extraction process was originally conceived at California’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with funds from a state grant, while Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago adapted it to be used with geothermal fluids.”

Coming from the same news company that pushed the “you didn’t build that” meme against President Obama all summer, that’s a pretty striking display of “fair and balanced” reporting on the relationship between public support and private initiative in modern democratic governance.

Fox News has also been credited with leading the hysteria-tinged conservative pushback against electric vehicles, but the article doesn’t touch on that angle. It simply makes a clear, concise case for how the Simbol project would lead directly to cheaper EVs like GM’s Chevy Volt and Ford Focus Electric.

From the Laboratory to Low-Cost Electric Vehicles

LLNL and Argonne are both part of the Department of Energy’s extensive research network, which works hand in glove with the private sector to spin off new technologies into commercial production, otherwise known as technology transfer.

Back in 2009, LLNL won three prestigious awards for technology transfer from the Federal Laboratory Consortium, and one of them involved the new low-cost lithium extraction process that Simbol will put into play.

According to LLNL, the process was initially developed in aid of the geothermal industry. The aim was to find an efficient way to remove silica from geothermal brines, which otherwise clogs pipes, filters, and other equipment at geothermal plants.

The process achieves a sustainability twofer by enabling geothermal plants to run more efficiently while transforming a waste disposal problem (spent brine) into valuable products, including lithium, manganese, zinc, silica, and tungsten.


Fair and Balanced Reporting on Clean Technology

The article hits numerous positive notes on the new process, concluding that “if producers like Simbol are successful, the price of EVs could drop dramatically.”

However, the article does make clear that’s a pretty big “if.” Simbol’s proposed lithium extraction plant is for a geothermal operation at the Salton Sea, which has a particularly high concentration of minerals. It’s not clear that the process would be cost-effective at other locations.

Fair enough. If you’re a regular reader here, you’ve probably noticed that our writers routinely issue the same type of caveats.

Meanwhile, it’s worth nothing that, from laboratory to commercialization, the whole project fits neatly into President Obama’s strategy for boosting domestic lithium production and reducing the reliance of important domestic industries on imported minerals, including the defense sector, as well as the cleantech sector.

Image (cropped): Electric vehicle by Parker Michael Knight (Some rights reserved)

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Spoutible.


You May Also Like


In another recent article, I explored how Ford is taking the Tesla approach to EVs, not only with its recently announced adoption of Tesla’s...


Earlier this month, Tesla battery cell supplier Panasonic announced that it would delay the commercial production schedule of 4680 cells. Some wonder if the...


The future of all ground transportation and an awful lot of aviation and marine shipping being electric, low-carbon, quieter, and a lot less smelly...

Clean Transport

Tesla recently held a groundbreaking ceremony for its new lithium refinery in Texas, during which CEO Elon Musk rolled up in a fully-outfitted Cybertruck....

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.