Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
The date is not etched in stone, but Deepwater Wind hopes to build the first U.S. offshore wind farm near Rhode Island, possibly replacing the energy generating capacity of nuclear power plants.

Clean Power

Deepwater Wind to Begin Construction on 30-Megawatt U.S. Offshore Wind Farm by 2014

The date is not etched in stone, but Deepwater Wind hopes to build the first U.S. offshore wind farm near Rhode Island, possibly replacing the energy generating capacity of nuclear power plants.

deepwater wind project

Offshore wind project scheduled at Block Island

The date is not etched in stone, but Deepwater Wind hopes to build the first U.S. offshore wind farm near Rhode Island, possibly replacing the energy generating capacity of nuclear power plants.

The privately held U.S. wind power developer plans to begin construction of the $205 million, 30-megawatt Block Island project in 2013 or 2014. If so, this farm will begin operations before an offshore farm proposed by Cape Wind – initially listed as this nation’s first offshore facility, Deepwater’s CEO, William Moore, said in an interview with Reuters.

The energy generated by the Block Island project will be enough to power about 10,000 homes in Rhode Island. The company is planning other projects off the Atlantic Coast as well, with three 1,000-meagawatt projects currently in the works – capable of generating electricity for some 350,000 homes.

“In order to get a competitive cost level, we need to get to scale, which means 750 to 1,000 MW, and at that size you are better off trying to sell into multiple markets,” Moore said.

While Cape Wind still expects its 420-MW project in Massachusetts to be the nation’s first utility-scale offshore wind farm, Deepwater hopes the smaller Block Island wind farm will help led the way to bigger projects.

As for the future of nuclear power in the area, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has indicated he hopes to shut the 2,065-MW Indian Point nuclear power plant in 2013 and 2015 when its two reactors’ operating licenses expire, at a time when Cape Wind proposes a 1,000-MW offshore wind project near New York City, even though it may not be ready by the time the reactors cease operating.

In the meantime, Entergy, owner of the nuclear plant, has indicated it wants the reactors to run for another 20 years and will seek new operating licenses. There is little doubt plenty will be heard on the subject of nuclear reactor safety in the coming months.

At the same time, offshore wind power developers face some obstacles to their clean energy planning, the biggest ones being the higher cost compared to natural gas and the lack of continuous wind. On the positive side of the ledger, wind as an energy source is very sustainable.

Photos: Deepwater Wind

 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

is a writer, producer, and director. Meyers was editor and site director of Green Building Elements, a contributing writer for CleanTechnica, and is founder of Green Streets MediaTrain, a communications connection and eLearning hub. As an independent producer, he's been involved in the development, production and distribution of television and distance learning programs for both the education industry and corporate sector. He also is an avid gardener and loves sustainable innovation.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

I saw an article in The Advocate today with the statement “I thought we were an oil and gas state” in the headline. It...

Cars

Tesla's China sales in April are as expected.

Nuclear Energy

The Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point) permanently stopped generating electricity on April 30, 2021, when it retired its last operating nuclear reactor, Unit 3, earlier...

Clean Transport

Tulane University has received $737,500 from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for the purchase of five electric...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.