Energy

ChatGPT & DALL-E generated panoramic image of a group of serious Germans experiencing groupthink over hydrogen as an energy carrier

German Energy Agency Dena Is Just As Subject To Hydrogen Gruppendenken As JRC & PIK

In recent months it’s become clear that there’s a distinctly non-cottage industry in Germany producing unintentionally and intentionally misleading reports about hydrogen for energy. Today yet another significant and respected organization crossed my screen, dena, or the German Energy Agency. (Lower-case is their branding and it’s an acronym of a … [continued]

ChatGPT & DALL-E generated panoramic image based on your request. It metaphorically depicts a shell game with an oil company executive using ornate golden barrels to hide a glowing barrel of oil, surrounded by various stakeholders

CCS Redux: ExxonMobil’s CO2 Sequestration Is Just A Tiny Fraction Of Its CO2 Emissions

Carbon capture and sequestration in all of its various ineffective, inefficient, and expensive forms is having another run up the hype cycle. Nothing has really changed. The problems still exist. The alternatives are still better. The potential for use is still minuscule. And so, we’ve got this CCS Redux series, … [continued]

ChatGPT & DALL-E generated panoramic line drawing that depicts a researcher cooking the books for hydrogen

EU JRC Puts Heavy Thumbs On Scale So Delivered Green Hydrogen From Africa Will Be…

Another day, another review of a major hydrogen for energy report which doesn’t stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Unfortunately, this one is from the EU’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), its science and knowledge service which employs scientists to carry out research in order to provide independent scientific advice and … [continued]

ChatGPT & DALL-E generated panoramic image depicting the whimsical scenario of researchers accidentally creating a hydrogen machine that alters weather patterns inside their laboratory.

Another European Energy Study Assumes Unrealistically Cheap Hydrogen & Finds Significant Demand

In recent months I’ve apparently taken on a sideline of assessing major total cost of ownership studies from reputable organizations, specifically looking at their usually weird assumptions around hydrogen. Now it’s the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research‘s turn, although it’s not a TCO study in this case. They’ve released … [continued]