Sierra Club Urges Rejection of Meta’s Attempt to Use Minor Source Loophole
Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Help us produce all of the high-quality, original content we publish week after week despite the challenges of content-scraping AI, antisocial media, inflation, and other hurdles.
Current proposal fails to consider all pollution and denies the public its lawful hearing
In comments submitted today to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), Sierra Club argues that Meta’s most recent air permit revisions trigger major-source permit requirements despite the tech conglomerate attempting to maintain a “minor source” permit while adding even more polluting equipment to its Hyperion site. Sierra Club also urged LDEQ commissioners to hold a public hearing on the permit revision that will release significant pollution into communities surrounding what will be the largest data center in the world.
LDEQ approved Meta’s initial minor source air permit in July of 2025 for operating 31 diesel emergency generators, a diesel fire pump, and diesel belly storage tanks (the application and comments refer to Laidley, a Meta subsidiary). Now Meta wants to modify this permit, adding 44 fossil-fuel water boilers that will operate and emit pollutants around the clock. Because this would send total pollution for the permit beyond the minor-source permit limits, Meta said that — instead of applying for a major source permit as required by the Clean Air Act — it simply wouldn’t count emissions from the previously approved 31 diesel generators when those are operating during emergency hours. LDEQ has so far indicated it is satisfied with this reasoning, and Sierra Club is now urging LDEQ that it must consider emissions from those diesel generators running during emergency operations.
“This massive project clearly crosses the threshold of what a ‘minor source’ permit would allow,” said Margie Vicknair-Pray, Sierra Club Delta Chapter Projects Coordinator.“If LDEQ moves this forward, it is only to speed up an already-rushed project at the expense of Louisianans’ health. Those generators will absolutely be used during ‘emergencies’ because that’s the entire reason they exist in the first place. We deserve the pollution limitations that come with the lawful, more protective permit, and we deserve the chance to have our voices heard at a public hearing. It is past time for our regulators to slow down the greenlighting of Gov. Landry’s pet project.”
Sierra Club’s official comments specifically contest LDEQ’s emission accounting, show that LDEQ incorrectly excluded emissions from emergency generator emergency operation hours, call for more significant pollution reporting requirements and pollution control modeling, and urge all parties to consider battery storage as a cleaner alternative.
As data centers rapidly expand across the country, many use fleets of diesel and gas generators while obtaining multiple “minor source” permits that have more lenient pollution limits and can obscure cumulative pollution impacts. Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency recently proposed cutting the public out of the minor source permitting process.
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
