Credit: ORNL, U.S. Dept. of Energy and Gate Precast

Benefit Breakdown: 3D Printed vs. Wood Molds

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Oak Ridge National Laboratory researchers have conducted a comprehensive life cycle, cost, and carbon emissions analysis on 3D-printed molds for precast concrete and determined the method is economically beneficial compared to conventional wood molds.

Precast concrete is used in building construction and produced by pouring the material into a reusable mold. For decades, these molds have been made from wood — a technique that requires a highly specialized skillset. As an alternative, molds made from fiber-reinforced polymer composites can be 3D printed.

“We developed a techno-economic model that compared costs associated with each method, evaluating materials, equipment, energy and labor,” ORNL’s Kristina Armstrong said. “3D printing can make complex molds faster, and the composites can be recycled, leading to more economical molds when used many times for precast concrete parts.”

Optimizing mold designs also reduces energy demand and carbon emissions. Future studies will further evaluate the recycling impact.

Originally published by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Latest CleanTechnica.TV Videos

Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

US Department of Energy

The mission of the U.S. Energy Department is to ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. Learn more.

US Department of Energy has 1052 posts and counting. See all posts by US Department of Energy