Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



“Forever Chemicals” Data from EPA Shows Widespread Contamination & Underestimate of PFAS Contaminating Tap Water

PFAS, a category of toxic chemicals that consists of thousands of man-made compounds, are used by industry and often added to consumer products, ranging from cookware to cosmetics, to make them stain- and water-resistant. PFAS are nearly indestructible “forever toxic” chemicals that are found in our air, water, food—and our bodies. They can be harmful to human health even at very low doses, with some being linked to immune suppression, cancer, and developmental disorders. However, there has been little done to address PFAS contamination.

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

“Forever Chemicals” Data from EPA Shows Widespread Contamination But is “Most Certainly” an Underestimate of PFAS Contaminating Tap Water

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) released the first tranche of testing data for PFAS in drinking water that found hundreds of water systems are contaminated with the toxic “forever chemicals.” About eight percent of water systems (serving approximately 14 million people) detected two of the most common of these chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, in their drinking water at levels that exceed EPA’s proposed drinking water limits. The data also surprisingly showed that nearly a quarter of water systems found lithium at levels exceeding EPA’s health reference level. Only about seven percent of the testing data that is expected to be released over the next three years was reported yesterday.

“Effects of exposure to PFASs on human health.[25][26][27][28][29][30]” By European Environment Agency (original image) Mrmw (vectorization), CC BY 2.5 DK, via Wikimedia Commons.

“The PFAS testing results suggest that there is extensive contamination of tap water. Our concern remains that these testing results significantly underreport the presence of PFAS in tap water, potentially misleading communities about the safety of their drinking water,” said NRDC Scientist Dr. Katie Pelch. “This is because only a fraction of the PFAS that may be present in drinking water are monitored for, and utilities are not required to report PFAS detected, but at levels below the reporting limits.”

“The focus needs to remain on people in our communities who deserve to know if their drinking water is contaminated with harmful PFAS chemicals or lithium. Federal, state, and local governing bodies must act swiftly to stop contamination, clean-up polluted water, and safeguard the health of everyday people,” said Erik D. Olson, NRDC senior strategic director for health.

PFAS chemicals can be highly toxic at extremely low levels and exposure has been linked to a long list of health effects, including cancer, immune suppression, and developmental harms.

It is not a surprise that the EPA data show a lower percentage of PFAS contamination than a recently-released national study of PFAS in tap water by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), since the USGS often tested for more PFAS than EPA and reported levels of PFAS lower than those reported by EPA.

Because EPA only requires public water systems to report data to the agency and to their consumers if their water’s contamination exceeds EPA’s “reporting limits,” often water systems will know that they have PFAS contamination because it was detected by their laboratory, but they are not required by EPA’s rules to report that detection to the public or EPA. This is especially problematic for PFOA and PFOS, which have EPA interim “Health Advisories” (the level EPA finds pose a health risk) of well below 1 part per trillion (ppt), yet the water systems are only required to report levels over 4 ppt to EPA and their customers under EPA’s rules.

Another potential reason that EPA’s data show lower percentages of contamination than previous analyses including the USGS study is that larger water utilities were allowed to push their testing requirements to later in the testing regime, which goes through 2025. A water system that knows or suspects it has a PFAS problem may have pushed its testing back to later in the program.

EPA’s testing rule measures only 29 PFAS, whereas more advanced testing can measure 70 or more PFAS. For example, in a study published in Science of the Total Environment earlier this year by NRDC, in collaboration with community partners and Eurofins Environment Testing, many PFAS were detected at levels below EPA’s reporting limits, and some PFAS not tested for by EPA’s methods were found more frequently than the 29 that EPA requires be tested.

One additional surprising test result released today is that 22 percent of systems tested found lithium at a level exceeding EPA’s Health Reference Level (the level EPA’s provisional peer-reviewed toxicity value says pose a health risk.) Lithium has been used in pharmaceuticals but also has been linked to certain adverse health effects including harm to the kidneys and endocrine glands including the thyroid. It can come from natural contamination but also from industrial, commercial and other uses including batteries.


It is estimated there are at least 14,000 PFAS chemicals in existence, of which hundreds are likely in commercial use. By the EPA’s own estimate, a population of 70-94 million people are served by systems impacted by its proposed regulation of just six PFAS chemicals.

Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, certain public water systems around the United States are required to test their drinking water every five years for a new list of unregulated contaminants. The primary focus of the EPA’s fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule a.k.a UCMR5, is PFAS, but also included testing for lithium. The testing results go on to inform future regulations and cleanup efforts and provide communities with crucial information about the safety of their water. Today’s announcement reveals the first seven percent of data based on EPA testing of 29 PFAS chemicals and lithium to understand how pervasive contamination is across the country.

Additional Resources:

Courtesy of NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council) — image & instagram post added.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

EV Obsession Daily!

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

Tesla Sales in 2023, 2024, and 2030

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
Written By

NRDC is the nation's most effective environmental action group, combining the grassroots power of 1.3 million members and online activists with the courtroom clout and expertise of more than 350 lawyers, scientists, and other professionals.


You May Also Like


New Report from Arup and the Natural Resources Defense Council Outlines Building, Construction Decarbonization Opportunities

Climate Change

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is the world’s...

Clean Power

Clean energy and transmission projects can bring benefits to the communities that host them. Inviting local interests to the planning table helps ensure that.

Fossil Fuels

New analysis predicts declining oil demand and rising exports over the next three decades, even with no new offshore leasing.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.