Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

April 2019 and 2020-2019 difference of inferred ground level nitrogen dioxide (NO2) mixing ratio near Atlanta. The green circle represents downtown Atlanta, the red diamonds represent coal-burning power plants with capacities > 2000 MW. The blue "X" represents Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. The black lines indicate major highways. Satellite-based estimates of air pollution allow us to observe the spatial distribution in a way that ground monitoring cannot. The figure shows 2019 NO2 concentrations and the 2020-2019 difference around Atlanta. The population-weighted NO2 concentration in Atlanta and the surrounding region dropped by 28% from April 2019 to 2020, but with significant spatial variability in the observed change. The greatest NO2 decreases are found near a large coal-powered electricity plant to the southeast of the city, with significant changes near another plant to the northwest (red diamonds). Decreases were also larger near the Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport (blue "X") and over suburban regions to the west and northeast of the city center, than in the downtown core (green circle). (Images courtesy of Martin lab)

Air Quality

Lockdown Drove Pollution Changes Between — Even Within — Cities

New method allows researchers to measure levels of NO2 on a finer scale, revealing disparities in exposure during COVID

Originally published on Washington University in St. Louis.
By Brandie Jefferson 

During COVID-19 lockdowns, the internet was flooded with images from Delhi to Los Angeles, showing mountains typically hidden behind smog or clear blue skies where they were once gray.

People speculated that, because fewer people were driving, industry slowed and many airports were functionally closed, levels of pollution had dropped everywhere.

They had, depending on your vantage point.

Researchers from Washington University in St. Louis developed a method using satellite measurements that allowed them to determine levels of nitrogen dioxide — NO2 — on a scale never before accessible — even in areas where there are no monitoring capabilities on the ground. NO2 is a key contributor to the smog associated with bad traffic or areas of intense industry.

Randall Martin

Developed in the lab of Randall Martin, the Raymond R. Tucker Distinguished Professor in the Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, the method allows researchers to infer levels of NO2 in regions as small as a neighborhood.

When they used it to compare levels of NO2 before and during COVID-19-related lockdowns across the globe, they found that, although there was a significant decrease in NO2 worldwide in areas under lockdown, there were also striking discrepancies on smaller scales.

The results were published Jan. 19 in the journal Nature.

“We can determine differences, not just from city to city, but within cities we were seeing interesting differences in levels of NO2,” said Matt Cooper, first author of the study. “Changes within cities weren’t uniform; some areas saw a larger decrease than others.”

Prior to the COVID-19-related lockdowns, Cooper had been working on ways to improve the detection of NO2 in the atmosphere using a new satellite technology. Then the pandemic hit.

This chart illustrates the range of NO2 changes experienced by the metro Atlanta population. More than 1.2 million people in the region saw a more than 40% decrease in NO2 levels. However, nearly 1 million people experienced decreases of only 10% or less.

“Interesting test case”

“It was an interesting test case for the new method,” Cooper said. “And there was plenty of interest in air quality, which seemed to be improving.”

Cooper was able to improve on methods that use modeling, satellites and ground-monitoring data to infer surface-level amounts of NO2 on any point on the globe. This new method makes better use of the finer-resolution satellite data, enabling researchers to determine levels of NO2 on a scale of about one kilometer.

Understanding levels of NO2 is important for a better understanding of human health. The chemical is one of the primary air pollutants, and it is a precursor to the creation of fine particulate matter. High exposure to NO2 is associated with a variety of health problems, mainly respiratory in nature, as well as a higher risk of mortality, overall.

Because it is primarily formed by burning fuel, researchers suggested the COVID-related lockdowns might lead to decreases in NO2. They did. Significantly.

Taking into account the variations expected by weather trends, and the fact that emissions have been generally decreasing over the past several years due to technological improvements, the researchers were able to infer decreases in surface-level NO2 were almost 30% larger in countries with strict lockdowns versus those without.

Overall, Martin said, “The global decrease during lockdowns was comparable to 15 years of annual reductions from emission controls.”

When they took a closer look, however, researchers found that the decreases were not evenly distributed. “We see very striking spatial variation,” Cooper said. “Find any city and you’ll see a signal.”

Take Atlanta, for one. Accounting for population, the concentration of NO2 decreased by 28% across the metro area between April 2019 and April 2020. But there is a lot of variation represented within that average rate.

For example, more than 1.2 million people in the region saw a more than 40% decrease in NO2 levels. However, nearly 1 million people experienced decreases of only 10% or less. Changes were generally larger for those living near coal-powered plants or the airport than in the downtown core.

Or Paris. More than 1 million people in the Paris metropolitan area saw a decrease in NO2 of 75% or more, while other metro areas saw a decrease in NO2 of 23% or less.

The benefits to this finer resolution go beyond identifying the unequal burden of pollution between neighbors. It also can help researchers better infer pollution levels in areas where there is no other way to determine levels of NO2. A significant part of the world does not have sufficient — or any — ground monitoring of pollutants.

Of the 215 cities the researchers investigated, 68 had no previous ground-monitoring data. Most of those cities, the researchers noted, were in lower-income countries in Africa and Southeast Asia. The average gross national income per capita for these unmonitored cities was $7,000. That’s in comparison with $25,000 for cities in countries with reliable ground monitoring.

“Although lower-income countries are less likely to have local air quality monitoring,” Cooper said, “large lockdown-driven changes in exposure to NO2 occurred regardless.”

This research was supported by Environment and Climate Change Canada and by the Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium; by NASA (673 80NSSC21K1343). We thank the OMI instrument team, and the OMI and TROPOMI teams for making NO2 data publicly available.

The McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis promotes independent inquiry and education with an emphasis on scientific excellence, innovation and collaboration without boundaries. McKelvey Engineering has top-ranked research and graduate programs across departments, particularly in biomedical engineering, environmental engineering and computing, and has one of the most selective undergraduate programs in the country. With 140 full-time faculty, 1,387 undergraduate students, 1,448 graduate students and 21,000 living alumni, we are working to solve some of society’s greatest challenges; to prepare students to become leaders and innovate throughout their careers; and to be a catalyst of economic development for the St. Louis region and beyond.

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.


You May Also Like


This is a heartwarming video of a contract tracer who won a Tesla last week. His reaction was filmed by his coworkers and reported...


Dealing with our climate crisis continues to be top of mind, although batteries, magnets, and exotic elements also captured the imagination Story by Julie Chao...


By Obianuju Ugwu-Oju, Jon Rea, and Maria Castillo Despite claims that the growth of clean energy has caused more burdensome electric bills, a new...

Air Quality

For commodities traders, businesses, strategists, and policy makers, I would recommend being very leery of most of the market analyses currently extant for aviation...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.