Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Image credit: Governor's Office, State of New York

Fossil Fuels

New York Says No To 2 (Un)Natural Gas Thermal Generating Plants

The state of New York has denied two requests to repower existing gas generating plants.

New York governor Kathy Hochul’s administration has done something unheard of. It has denied permits for two unnatural gas generating plants that were seeking to repower. Here’s what is extraordinary. Hochul’s Department of Environmental Conservation followed the New York climate law. How extraordinary!

NRG’s 959 MW fuel oil- and gas-powered Astoria facility and the Danskammer gas-fired generating station in Orange County wanted to repower with more efficient natural gas technology. Developers of both projects argued the upgrades would reduce overall emissions from the power sector in the near term. They proposed potentially running on hydrogen in the future or renewable natural gas, but the DEC said those plans were speculative.

Environmental groups are jubilant. They have been opposed to the repowering plans for year. “Both [plants] would be inconsistent with New York’s nation leading climate law and are not justified or needed for grid reliability. We must shift to a renewable future,” wrote DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos, who announced the decision on Twitter.

According to Politico, the decisions are the first regarding air permits to directly cite the state’s climate law. Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration rejected a water quality permit for a gas pipeline serving Long Island in a decision that partly cited the climate law.

New York has mandated a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 40% from 1990 levels by 2030 with the remainder to be offset by 2050. The law also requires all electricity come from emissions-free sources by 2040 which pretty much rules out thermal generating facilities. “This is a very positive and necessary step the state has taken,” said Liz Moran with Earthjustice. “We have to stop permitting new fossil fuel plants.”

Scenic Hudson’s Hayley Carlock says the denials set a new precedent and indicate any future projects that involve significant emissions will be subject to strict scrutiny. “This is a clear sign from the DEC and Hochul administration that they’re taking the climate law seriously,” she said. “This is a real wake-up call to the whole energy industry — that we’re very serious about this transition.”

Hochul was careful not to take too much credit for the permit decisions. While DEC officially makes these calls, previous governors have sometimes been involved — and both Danskammer and NRG made their case to the executive chamber. The governor said she applauded the decision by DEC, “in the context of our state’s clean energy transition.”

The department’s denials say that while the details of achieving the reductions in the climate law are still being worked through, new fossil fuel plants aren’t compatible with the requirement to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the next three decades.

“Particularly in the absence of any justification for the Project or the identification of alternatives or appropriate [greenhouse gas] mitigation measures, a new fossil fuel fired generation facility like this Project could exacerbate and extend the use of fossil fuels to produce electricity, contrary to the requirements of the Climate Act,” DEC’s Daniel Whitehead, director of the Division of Environmental Permits, wrote in the denial letter to NRG.

The NRG Astoria plant is being forced to shut down under new DEC regulations targeting harmful nitrogen oxide emissions — rules that are being phased in starting in 2023 and are expected to shutter several New York City peaker plants. Transmission projects by Con Edison identified through a process involving the state’s grid operator are expected to ensure there aren’t any reliability impacts.

The denials by DEC cited the lack of reliability as one reason to reject the projects. The agency also noted that the state hasn’t yet determined if renewable natural gas combustion will be permitted under the climate law.

Both plants had provided modeling showing that overall electricity system emissions would be lower because the newer turbines would be more efficient and replace older, dirtier units. The DEC said this is not a sufficient basis to approve the permits and that the agency doesn’t take into account what may or may not happen at other emitting facilities.

“The extent to which the Project might displace other electric generating units is uncertain and dependent upon a number of factors that are not fully controlled by Danskammer, including the relative dispatch of the Project and other sources, as well as future market conditions,” Whitehead wrote in the letter to Danskammer. Both companies have 30 days to request a hearing on the decision by DEC.

Danskammer runs infrequently, typically only when electricity demand is particularly high and can continue to operate under its existing permits. Tom Atkins, the vice president of development at the NRG, said his company is reviewing the DEC decision and will continue to operate for now.

“It’s unfortunate that New York is turning down an opportunity to dramatically reduce pollution and strengthen reliable power for millions of New Yorkers at such a critical time,” Atkins said in a statement. “NRG’s Astoria Replacement Project would have provided immediate reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and would have been fully convertible to green hydrogen in the future.”

Current power plants owners and fossil industry groups have pointed to an analysis by the state and others finding a need for dispatchable, long-duration power as the state transitions to more renewables. They say the state needs a reliable source of electricity when there are multi-day lulls of wind and solar. They have proposed hydrogen generated from renewables as a likely option but argue newer plants could lower emissions now and run on fossil fuels while the green hydrogen economy is developed.

Gavin Donohue, president and CEO of the Independent Power Producers of New York which includes existing fossil, hydropower, renewable, and other power sources, said members support the development of zero emissions technologies to achieve the state’s climate law goals. “The State needs a path forward to encourage necessary investment to meet the [climate law’s] targets. The DEC’s decisions to deny permits sends a chilling signal that the business climate needed to develop these technologies is at risk, and today’s decisions by the DEC are simply short-sighted and bad public policy.”

The state’s Public Service Commission has requested comments on a petition by Independent Power Producers and labor groups to define and subsidize new resources that can be used to keep the lights on. Some environmental groups are worried such a program would detract from investments in proven renewables and energy storage resources while providing cover for new fossil fuel infrastructure.

Several lawmakers and activists pivoted to call on DEC to reject pending air permits for new liquified natural gas vaporizers at National Grid’s Greenpoint facility. The utility has said that project is key to meeting winter demand for gas in future years, but advocates have raised concerns about local air quality and climate impacts. DEC has said it is reviewing the permit for that project, including mitigation measures proposed by the utility.

“We hope Governor Hochul’s decisions to stop Danskammer and Astoria NRG are the first of the dominoes to fall,” said Laura Shindell, an organizer with Food & Water Watch in a statement. “We expect similar decisions on polluting projects from National Grid’s fracked gas vaporizers in Brooklyn, to the proposed Gowanus power plant, and look forward to seeing state commitments to a truly clean energy future for New York — free of fossil fuels.”

Those projects require new permits, but advocates — testifying during a Wednesday Assembly hearing against a cryptocurrency mining operation at an existing gas plant in the Finger Lakes — expressed hope DEC would take a similar tack with the permit renewal in that case.

All credit to the state of New York for sticking to its guns. In an era where politicians love to make flowery speeches and then kowtow to fossil fuel interests in private, this decision may qualify for this year’s Profiles In Courage award. The only way to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide and other pollutants from entering the atmosphere is to stop burning fossil fuels. If only other jurisdictions had the courage to do what must be done.

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. 3000 years ago, Socrates said, "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new." Perhaps it's time we listened?


You May Also Like

Clean Transport

Volvo Group North America (VGNA) today announced that it received a $10 million award from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to introduce...


The US heat pump market is growing, but it needs to accelerate to achieve critical climate goals. Across the United States, over 15 states...

Autonomous Vehicles

We give much attention to autonomous driving companies like Waymo, Cruise, Tesla, Argo AI, etc., yet often forget about little autonomous shuttle company Navya....

Clean Transport

Downtown Middletown in the Mid-Hudson Region New York has just received the first open-access electric vehicle (EV) fast chargers thanks to the New York...

Copyright © 2022 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.