Tesla Superchargers Leave Competitors “In The Dust,” Harvard Business Review Writes

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on EV Annex.

Charging an electric vehicle during a road trip offers a myriad of different possibilities. But sometimes a simple solution is best. Tesla, in turn, has created its own proprietary charging network. And, according to a recent article in the Harvard Business Review, “Tesla’s charging stations [have] left other manufacturers in the dust.”

Tesla Model 3 Supercharging. Photo by Kyle Field, CleanTechnica.

“Despite investments that add up to many billions of dollars, none of the major incumbent automakers seems to pose much of a threat to market leader Tesla,” writes Hemant Bhargava, Jonas Boehm, and Geoffrey G. Parker in Harvard Business Review.

Why? According to the authors, “The reason why consumers still choose Teslas over products like Audi’s e-tron or attractive EVs from GM’s Buick, Cadillac, GMC, and Chevy brands is perhaps surprisingly simple. They can drive their Teslas for long distances in full confidence that they will find convenient locations at which to recharge their vehicle. While the incumbent automakers are still focused narrowly on perfecting their electric cars, Tesla has been thinking about the entire vehicle system, with the aim of solving consumers’ core driving needs.”

In contrast, looking at the options for legacy automakers, “the network of available [non-Tesla] charging stations is highly fractured across ownership and technology. The next largest network, compared to Tesla, is only 10% as large. Unless you buy a Tesla, you have few options for reliable route planning, guaranteed access, and rapid public charging.”

The solution? “[Legacy] automakers would be well advised to take a leaf out of Tesla’s playbook and focus on the network,” notes Harvard Business Review.

A look at the Tesla Supercharger network. Video by Tesla, via YouTube.

“Firms that dream of being the next Tesla should carefully examine why they are so far behind. It’s not for lack of knowledge about how to build cars; many of the incumbent firms have been doing that for over a hundred years. Instead, they should focus on the critical infrastructure, in this case the charging networks, that have made customers willing to take a chance on a newcomer,” reports Harvard Business Review.

In another analysis from Forbes, Brookes Crothers acknowledges some significant traction from VW’s efforts with Electrify America and GM’s alliance with EVgo, “albeit still far behind Tesla in total numbers,” he says. “Tesla is still the gold standard for charging infrastructure and it shows no signs of slowing down.”

Crothers reminds us of Sun Microsystems’ slogan in the ’80s, which was, “the network is the computer.” Fast forward to the present and consider a slightly different spin on that slogan — an EV is only as good as its charging network.

There’s more research supporting these findings too. The University of California (Davis) and Dartmouth College came to a similar conclusion in a joint study which touted Tesla’s Supercharger network as the dominant “platform” play in the auto world — but it’s certainly not Tesla’s only advantage.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Latest CleanTechnica.TV Videos

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Matt Pressman

Matt is all about Tesla. He’s a TSLA investor, and he loves driving the family's Model 3, Model S, and Model X company cars. As co-founder of EVANNEX, a family business specializing in aftermarket Tesla accessories, he’s served as a contributor/editor of Electric Vehicle University (EVU) and the Owning Model S and Getting Ready for Model 3 books. He writes daily about Tesla and you can follow his work on the EVANNEX blog.

Matt Pressman has 332 posts and counting. See all posts by Matt Pressman