Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



Calculating The True Cost Of A Society Based On Automobiles

A report by the Harvard Kennedy School concludes that Massachusetts citizens spend more than $64 billion a year to support a model based on private car ownership. Are they getting good value for their money?

Ever heard the expression, “Can’t see the forest for the trees?” It suggests that sometimes we get so caught up in the details of what is right in front of us that we can’t see the big picture. Prompted by an inquiry from Congressman Seth Moulton, researchers at the Harvard Kennedy School set out to determine just how much money the state of Massachusetts and its citizens spend each year to maintain a transportation system based on private car ownership.


The answer, according to the researchers, is a staggering $64.1 billion. “This is a huge number,” said the paper’s lead author, Stevie Olson. “It’s unexpected because the majority of drivers, citizens, consumers experience roads for free. You just drive out your parking lot, your driveway, and you’re on the road. No one’s charging you, but there’s all of these costs that are both public costs, indirect externalities that are also costs, and then private costs that people are incurring.”

More than half of that figure — $35.7 billion — comes from public funds, the report states. That comes out to around $14,000 for every household in the state. Households with private vehicles pay another $12,000 in direct costs, the researchers say.

Some of the costs borne by various state and local governments involve obvious things like road maintenance, snow removal, and policing. But they also include less obvious intangibles such as the effects of pollution, the value of land set aside for parking lots, lost productivity from sitting in traffic, and various costs associated with injuries and deaths on the road

Congressman Moulton has an agenda. He is an advocate for more public transportation, especially electrified trains. But the research is valuable in its own right as a way of informing people just how expensive a transportation systems based on private vehicle ownership really is. “If you think about it as an equation, [private vehicle ownership] is a variable that has not been in the conversation, and it’s something that should we be considering as we think about what is the best way to provide transportation options to the public,” says Linda Bilmes, a senior lecturer in public policy at the Kennedy School who oversaw the research.

“We’re not trying to say that cars are bad or that we don’t need roads. We’re just trying to say that if we think about the overall cost/benefit analyses around transportation when it comes to this conversation, not only is there a cost to the vehicle economy, but the cost is actually larger than we may have realized.”

Moulton says, “I asked for this study because we lead the country in bad traffic, and the best solution to that problem is building a reliable, regional, electrified rail system. But a lot of people point to the cost of a rail system as the excuse not to do it. They advocate for wider roads and other short-sighted fixes, but the truth is we pay massive amounts to subsidize car travel and don’t even know it. Professor Bilmes and her students finally put a price tag on driving.”

Stevie Olson adds, “While the $64 billion cost applies to Massachusetts, the costs of the vehicle economy are similar across states. The price tag for this infrastructure is big in every state, and you can imagine collectively as a nation that the total is huge. We can use the study to think about urban travel, such as in a metropolitan area, but we can also use it to start thinking about interstate travel. The study illuminates tradeoffs that we make when investing in transportation infrastructure, and, rather than think of roads as free, we need to realize that significant resources go into the operation of the motor vehicle economy.”

If you think the cost of vehicle ownership figures listed above are unrealistic, consider this. Every year, Kelley Blue Book announces its “5 Year Cost To Own” awards. For the past three years, the award for electric cars has gone to the Nissan LEAF. KBB says it costs $40,186 to own one for 5 years. The numbers for other popular electric cars are $42,417 for the Chevy Bolt and $44,910 for the Hyundai Kona Electric. (The Tesla Model 3 is omitted from KBB’s analysis for some unknown reason.)

You may quibble with how Kelley Blue Book comes up with its numbers — the amount of range available for each car and how the federal tax credit should affect the calculation, for instance — but nothing changes the fact that owning a car in the United States today has a direct cost to owners of over $8,000 a year.

That’s a ton of money but it’s something most people never think about because we don’t just get a bill every month for $666.00 for each car we own. The total is a composite of taxes, fuel, insurance, repairs, finance charges and other costs.  We tend to focus solely on the amount of our monthly car payment and ignore everything else. How many of us ever stop to ponder the cost of the environmental consequences we leave in our wake?

The point is not that public transportation is a better alternative. The point is that individually and collectively, we pay an enormous amount of money each year to support a lifestyle that is predicated on owning private cars. Perhaps it is time to stop and think about whether that model is sustainable. If nothing else, the results of this Harvard study can help inform that conversation.

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. He is proud to be "woke" and doesn't really give a damn why the glass broke. He believes passionately in what Socrates said 3000 years ago: "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new."


You May Also Like

Clean Power

China has opened a 1-kilometer solar road. It features solar panels sandwiched between transparent concrete on top and an insulating layer underneath. It can...

Air Quality

In a last-minute save, California legislators approved funding for a high-speed rail network that is to link Los Angeles to San Francisco. Supporters assert...


In order for EV usage to become widespread, a proper charging infrastructure is paramount. Saitama is testing a model infrastructure for user convenience second,...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.