Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Flow battery membrane Berkeley Lab


Better Membranes Make Better Flow Batteries

Researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab say they have devised a new membrane for flow batteries that is durable and inexpensive. Just the ticket for low cost grid scale energy storage.

Flow batteries could one day provide the long term storage of electricity needed to make renewable energy commercially viable everywhere. They have the potential to cost less than lithium-ion batteries and avoid some of the pitfalls associated with lithium-ion, such as fires and explosions. They tend to take up more room but that is seldom an issue when it comes to grid scale storage. Conceptually, flow batteries are simple devices. Two chambers filled with liquid, one with a positive charge, the other with a negative charge. Separate the two liquids with a membrane that allows electrons to pass back and forth and voila! You have a battery.

Flow battery membrane Berkeley Lab

Image credit: Joule

The membrane is the secret to making the whole thing both economical and durable. Most flow batteries today use flourinated membranes which are expensive — up to 20% of the total cost of a battery. Cheaper membranes simply don’t stand up very long to the highly alkaline environment found inside a typical flow battery.

According to research paper published recently in the journal Joule, scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab say they have have developed a versatile yet affordable battery membrane from a class of polymers known as AquaPIMs. These polymers make inexpensive and long lasting grid batteries possible based solely on abundant materials such as zinc, iron, and water. AquaPIM membranes work with different battery chemistries, from metals and inorganics to organics and polymers, and they help create stable cells which last far longer before degrading.

The team also developed a simple computer modeling technique that shows how different battery membranes impact the life expectancy or a flow battery. That tool should accelerate early stage R&D for flow-battery technologies, particularly in the search for a suitable membrane for different battery chemistries.

“Our AquaPIM membrane technology is well-positioned to accelerate the path to market for flow batteries that use scalable, low-cost, water-based chemistries,” Brett Helms, a principal investigator in the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research and lead researcher, tells Environment News Network. “By using our technology and accompanying empirical models for battery performance and lifetime, other researchers will be able to quickly evaluate the readiness of each component that goes into the battery, from the membrane to the charge-storing materials. This should save time and resources for researchers and product developers alike.”

Anything that could drive the renewable energy revolution forward is a good thing.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. 3000 years ago, Socrates said, "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new." Perhaps it's time we listened?


You May Also Like


A $24 million investment in new long duration energy storage technology gives Cummins yet another reason to support the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.


A new flow battery for electric vehicles is getting attention from DARPA, NASA, and the US Air Force.

Clean Power

In the United States, the towers of new wind plants often measure greater than 90 meters in height and the rotors themselves can extend...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.