This California home will include no access to gas at all — will be 100% electric, powered by a Tesla Solar Roof.
I came across a very interesting statistic the other day from the IEA’s Renewables 2018 report. The statistic is that 50% of total energy consumption globally is used for the production of heat for our homes, industry, and other applications.
Most of this heat comes from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and is responsible for a significant proportion of world pollution. However, to date, we have seen very little progress across the world in cleaning up how we heat, and that’s despite the existence of cost effective and greener solutions.
The major reason for this is that the heating systems we have built across much of the world are both costly and troublesome to change and there is a whole pile of government incentives which favor the fossil fuel alternatives. That said, there are a lot of environmental pressures which are forcing change, starting with air quality in cities like Beijing and Delhi, and adding in global pressure to decarbonize.
The complexity with heat starts with its physics. Heat is all about the flow of energy and works in three different ways: by convection, by conduction, and by radiation. Heat is also governed by two important scientific laws — the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The first law states that energy can not be created or destroyed but just goes from one form to another; the second law states that it is impossible to convert one form of energy to another without some form of heat loss. Some of the greatest losses take place with oil and gas as they are converted from chemical to heat energy to power an internal combustion engine or a turbine. It is thus critical going forward to either reduce the level of waste heat or to capture that heat for other purposes.
There are many ways to reduce waste heat, such as building better insulated buildings or increasing the efficiency of an engine. One other way is to capture and use the waste heat for other purposes, such as heating water, which can be used locally in a district heating system. However, such systems are costly and take time to build. That said, the digitalization of our world is providing us with a massive opportunity to rethink heat. Case in point: Dublin Ireland.
In recent years, electricity demand in Dublin has exploded, the main reason for which is the growth in data centers from the likes of Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Google. The main use of that electricity is to keep those data centers cool with much of the waste heat just pumped out into the Irish air. It would make much more sense to use that heat, for instance, for growing food in glasshouses or for heating buildings. In the coming years, the number of data centres that will be built is truly enormous and this is a unique opportunity not just for Dublin but for much of the world to build new and more sustainable heating systems around these new power guzzlers.
The biggest step change in heating would be in moving away from traditional fossil fuel heating, where most of the heat is lost through the chimney, towards electrical heating systems such as infrared, which are much more efficient. Combine such an electrical heating system with a heat pump and you have an almost perfect system that can also be used to provide cooling in summer. However, government regulation means that not every country uses the most sustainable solution.
In Europe, many counties such as Ireland, the UK, and Germany use gas and oil for heating purposes. They do so because the incentive structures favor the fossil fuel. So, for instance, where I live outside of Berlin, heating oil costs 8 cents per kWh, gas costs 7 cents per kWh, while electricity (over 50% carbon free) costs are 30 cents per kWh. Interestingly, though, the difference is mainly due to government surcharges and taxes, and you’d think that could be changed easily. But it is tough to change, as millions of household owners and voters already own a fossil fuel heating system, and so any change in how energy is taxed (including a large carbon tax) would meet significant resistance. Unsurprisingly, NGOs concentrate on fighting against some “evil” multinational oil company or coal power station, as the last thing they want to do is make an enemy of the end customer. What this all means is that heat is likely to remain the “elephant in the room” that everyone ignores.