Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
X Auto Porsche Taycan Turbo S vs. Tesla Model S P100D Acceleration Times

Cars

Porsche Taycan Turbo S Beats Tesla Model S P100D In 0–100 km/h & 0–250 km/h Acceleration Times

The Porsche Taycan might not be giving Tesla a tough time in the technological advancement or self-driving arena, but when it comes to the numbers some drivers value so much, it is giving Tesla a challenge with every passing day.

Originally published on X Auto.
by Iqtidar Ali | @IqtidarAlii

The Porsche Taycan might not be giving Tesla a tough time in the technological advancement or self-driving arena, but when it comes to the numbers some drivers value so much, it is giving Tesla a challenge with every passing day.

In the following video, we can see the Tesla Model S P100D lose to the Porsche Taycan Turbo S in terms of reaching 0–100 km/h (0–62 mph) and up to 0–250 km/h, where the Taycan truly shines. It takes the Taycan significantly less time to reach 250 km/h than the Model S (for results, see the following table).

Last weekend, the Model S P100D lost to the Taycan Turbo S in a drag race and handling test, and now we have some interesting results that demonstrate the Taycan is proving to be an ultimate driver’s electric sports car.

Porsche Taycan Turbo S vs. Tesla Model S P100D Acceleration Times

The 0–250 km/h top speed attempt was made on a 2017 Tesla Model S P100D, which was missing this year’s “Raven drivetrain” and the new “adaptive air suspension.” Further, the initial time of 2.8 secs for 0–100 km/h for the Model S is a bit low — might be because of the driver.

But in the long run, Tesla Model S’s 22.53 seconds to reach 250 km/h is a staggering 9 secs more than the Taycan Turbo S.

Porsche has really put together this car as a true sports car — reaching 250 km/h in 13.52 secs is blazing fast. This is the performance Porsche is charging $180,000 for the Taycan Turbo S.

Although Porsche has listed the official top speed of the Taycan Turbo S as 259 km/h (161 mph), we can witness that the car reached 260 km/h with ease. Kudos to Porsche for being so conservative when it comes to performance numbers.

For these reasons Tesla felt the urgent need to introduce the Tri-Motor Plaid Model S and it’s currently being tested again at the Nürburgring. The right decision at the right time, Tesla — Porsche is stealing the show.

The following two videos were used in the above comparison compilation and to derive results.

*It is important to remember that 0–100 km/h is not equal to 0–60 mph. The Tesla Model S P100D’s 2.5 sec time is for 0–60 mph, which is actually 96.56 km/h. Porsche officially does not list 0–60 mph numbers, while Tesla does not list 0–100 km/h numbers. I think they both should to clarify confusions.

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Comments

You May Also Like

Autonomous Vehicles

This is “part deux” to a previous article, “E-Mode: Applying First Principles To A Complicated Law That Many Drivers Don’t Know Exist.” In part...

Cars

In an interview with CNBC’s Andrew Sorkin this past week, General Motors CEO Mary Barra shared some interesting alternative facts about Tesla and how...

Cars

An expanded version of this article was just sent out to subscribers of our weekly newsletter. Want to receive our weekly newsletter? Sign up...

Autonomous Vehicles

Below is a portion of an article originally published on Tesla Oracle. Tesla has rolled out the latest installment of its Full Self-Driving software...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.