Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

US EPA website [screenshot], Coal Ash (Coal Combustion Residuals, Or CCR),


This Is Exactly Why Clean Coal Is A Joke

The coal ash problem will continue to bedevil the “clean coal” label, regardless of whether or not utilities reduce carbon emissions.

The US utility Ameren Missouri should be walking on sunshine right now. The company has just announced its second rate cut this year, thanks in part to its new “Smart Energy” plan which is loaded with clean tech goodies. Instead, Ameren Missouri is facing the wrath of environmental groups and local residents over its plan for dealing with tons of ash left over from its coal power plants. Clean coal my foot!

Clean Coal Is Clean, Except For You-Know-What

Anyone remember the Tennessee coal ash spill of 2008? What about the North Carolina coal ash spill of 2014? Okay, so how about that other coal ash spill in North Carolina that happened just last fall?

How does coal ash spill, anyways?

That’s an easy one. Clean coal or not, coal ash is the toxic material left over when coal burns. It can be re-used in various ways but it is loaded with mercury, arsenic and other materials. The safest thing to do is store it indefinitely in unlined, open air ponds or lagoons, often by a river or stream.

I kid! It’s not particularly safe to transport coal ash and store it in open air ponds, especially not near a waterway. Aside from the examples of Tennessee and North Carolina, the “clean coal” experience of residents near a coal ash disposal site Pennsylvania raises all kinds of environmental justice issues.

Part of the problem is that no federal agency required power plants to account for their ash ponds until 2015, when the EPA shouldered the task. The first disclosures finally rolled out last fall. Some little issues with transparency, organization, accessibility, methodology, and standardization have made it a bit difficult to assess the results on a national basis, but environmental groups have been picking through the data and the picture ain’t pretty.

So, What About All That Coal Ash?

The Obama administration’s EPA also proposed new regulations for coal ash disposal in 2014 under a revved-up timeline. The new rules got stuck in legal limbo after coal power plant stakeholders weighed in and won a series of deadline extensions.

In one recent development this past January, a coal group threatened to cut the juice to all of their power plants if the Obama-era timeline is upheld.

No, for real. They literally threatened to take their clean coal and go home. Here’s a snippet from their court filing, posted by our friends over at E&E News (citations deleted for readability):

Without time to develop alternative disposal capacity for the wastestreams generated during power plant operations, operators will face the untenable choice of either ceasing power production — with the attendant risks to power reliability for regions across the country — or continuing to place wastestreams in units that EPA says are required to immediately close.

Time? Guys, it’s been like five years. Anyway, not to worry. In March the Trump* administration’s EPA proposed new, more relaxed rules for coal ash disposal.

So far the new rules have held up in court and that’s where “clean coal” stands now.

Ameren Missouri & The Clean Coal Whack-A-Mole

As for Ameren, our friends over at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch have the scoop on the utility’s handling of its legacy coal ash disposal sites. Follow the link to see how reporter Bryce Gray describes the impact of regulatory uncertainty on the situation. The end result is that Ameren appears to be committed to a  closure plan that does not fully address the contamination issue:

…despite that uncertainty about which direction coal ash rules could take, groups that track the issue say the St. Louis-based utility, Ameren, sounds certain about plans to close its legacy ash ponds while leaving contaminants in the ground

Basically, it’s cheaper to cap old ash pits than excavating all the ash and putting it into more secure containment, though that leaves the pesky issue of groundwater contamination to sort itself out.

There is a lot of sorting to do. According to Gray’s reporting, Ameren has 4 coal power plants and 14 ash ponds around the St. Louis region. Some of them are lined at the bottom, but others are not.

And Now For The Good News

While Ameren Missouri seeks a cure for yesterday’s clean coal hangover, the utility has also been touting its march toward the sparkling green tomorrow.

Last week the utility announced that it is requesting its second rate decrease since last summer. Ameren credits its 2018 Smart Energy Plan with enabling the modest decrease, along with a new statewide energy policy approved by Missouri legislators in 2018.

The proposed ratemaking also includes incentives for customers to use more energy off-peak, including overnight EV charging.

Looking forward, Ameren has a 5-year plan to invest $5.3 billion investment in hundreds of projects aimed at creating a “smarter, more secure and storm-resilient system to reduce the length and likelihood of outages.”

That includes more wind and solar integration, thanks in part to the Mark Twain wind transmission line and an additional $1 billion wind energy investment. The utility also plans to focus on energy storage and smart meters, as well as an efficiency upgrade program that Ameren describes as its largest ever.

Next up for the company: addressing the impacts of its natural gas business.

Follow me on Twitter.

*Developing story.

Image (screenshot): US EPA, Coal Ash (Coal Combustion Residuals, Or CCR),

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Spoutible.


You May Also Like

Climate Change

Rising temperatures threaten communities along the river.


North Carolina has ordered Duke Energy to excavate existing coal ash pits and transfer the contents to lined containment areas to limit groundwater pollution.The...


The latest data from groundwater monitoring systems shows 90% of coal ash storage pits are leaching harmful toxins into the environment. The EPA wants...


The US Energy Dept. wants to upgrade old coal power plants, but a standoff over coal ash disposal demonstrates why they all have one...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.