Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

GRACE satellite system
Credit: NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Climate Change

For Nearly 20 Years, GRACE Has Helped Us Understand Climate Change

For 15 years, the GRACE twin satellite system allowed scientists to better understand how the Earth’s climate was changing. Now a second generation monitoring system is in place to provide even more accurate data about climate change.

In 2002, two satellites designed to take detailed measurements of the Earth were launched into space. The Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment — GRACE for short — was intended to operate for no more than 5 years, yet it continued sending back critically needed data for nearly 15 years. The mission was a collaboration between NASA and the German Aerospace Center and was led by researchers in the Center for Space Research at the University of Texas’ Cockrell School of Engineering.

GRACE satellite system

Credit: JPL/NASA

During its operational lifespan, GRACE provided unprecedented insight into global water resources, from more accurate measurements of polar ice loss to a better view of the ocean currents and the rise in global sea levels. Much of the data it returned to the scientists waiting on Earth has proved vital to understanding the extent to which climatic changes have occurred since the GRACE program began.

Bryan Tapley established the Center for Space Research in 1981 and has served as the principal coordinator of the GRACE program. By measuring changes in mass that cause deviations in the strength of gravity’s pull on the Earth’s various systems — water systems, ice sheets, atmosphere, land movements, and more — the satellites can measure small changes in the Earth system interactions, he tells Science Daily.

“By monitoring the physical components of the Earth’s dynamical system as a whole, GRACE provides a time variable and holistic overview of how our oceans, atmosphere and land surface topography interact. The concept of using the changing gravimetric patterns on Earth as a means to understanding major changes in the Earth system interactions had been proposed before,” he says, “but we were the first to make it happen at a measurement level that supported the needs of the diverse Earth-science community.”

The Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas has played a vital role in the GRACE program. Tapley says TACC made it possible to pose questions whose solutions would have not been feasible without it.

“As an example, when we began the GRACE mission, our capability was looking at gravity models that were characterized by approximately 5,000 model parameters, whose solution was obtained at approximately yearly analysis intervals.

“The satellite-only GRACE models today are based on approximately 33,000 parameters that we have the ability to determine at a daily interval. In the final re-analysis of the GRACE data, we’re looking to expand this parameterization to 4,000,000 parameters for the mean model. The interaction with TACC has always been in the context of: ‘If the answer to a meaningful question requires extensive computations, let’s find a way to satisfy that requirement.'”

The data from GRACE is processed through TACC and shared with the Geophysics Center in Potsdam and the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. “The collection of information from this international community are brought together by the fundamental computing capability and the operational philosophy at TACC to undergo the challenging data analysis required to obtain the paradigm-shifting view of the Earth’s interactions,” Tapley says.

Now, a new program called the GRACE Follow-On mission has launched successfully. It will allow researchers to  create a second multi-decadal measurement of changes in mass across the Earth. Engineers and scientists anticipate the longer data interval will allow them to see an even clearer picture of how the planet’s climate patterns behave over time.

Now if only we could dispel the notion that all those researchers are agenda driven fat cats chasing around after public and private grant money to pad their own wallets, perhaps the world would stop perseverating about Al Gore and get to work finding solutions to a rapidly warming planet. Who started those scurrilous rumors anyway? Oh, right. Charles and David Koch and ExxonMobil. Thanks, guys, for destroying our planet in your single minded pursuit of personal financial gain.


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his homes in Florida and Connecticut or anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. You can follow him on Twitter but not on any social media platforms run by evil overlords like Facebook.


#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.


Support our work today!

Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports




Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like

Climate Change

Those wells need to be decommissioned so that they never again spout emissions. But promising climate action and delivering it are two entirely different...

Clean Power

The duplicity is everywhere. Although red state legislators stall key climate legislation, they benefit in their home states by promoting renewable energy enterprises. Their...


We've been taught that a tidy lawn is a sign of a stable and prosperous homeowner. What happens when the copious amounts of water...

Consumer Technology

Humans generate a remarkable amount of garbage: over 2 billion tons per year. Can startups help to alleviate this problem? Are home recycling devices...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.