#1 cleantech news, reviews, & analysis site in the world. Subscribe today. The future is now.


Climate Change no image

Published on April 15th, 2019 | by Steve Hanley

0

Climate Change & The Extinction Rebellion — Less Talking, More Doing

April 15th, 2019 by  


The Extinction Rebellion began on April 15. What is it? According to Wikipedia, it is a “socio-political movement which intends to utilize nonviolent resistance to avert climate breakdown, halt biodiversity loss, and minimise the risk of human extinction and ecological collapse….Citing inspiration from grassroots movements such as Occupy, Gandhi’s independence movement, the suffragettes, and Martin Luther King and others in the civil rights movement, Extinction Rebellion wants to rally support worldwide around a common sense of urgency to tackle climate breakdown.”

Extinction Rebellion climate change

Credit: Extinction Rebellion

In other words, it’s a socialist movement designed to impose the will of the people on the governments of the world. Oh, dear. Lots of people won’t like that! Is it having any effect? The Guardian reports that protesters have taken over Waterloo Bridge in London and turned it into a garden. That, of course, is a criminal offense, one that will lead to mass arrests because traffic must never, ever be interrupted for any reason — unless it’s to allow some potentate to pass.

Laura Sorensen, a retired teacher from Somerset, tells The Guardian, “I am so worried about what’s happening to the planet. We are on a knife-edge now and I felt strongly that I needed to get out and show myself, rather than just talk about it in the pub. I see this disaster unfolding all around me … it is terrifying and the government have done nothing despite all the warnings, so we have to act now.”

The Extinction Rebellion Manifesto

What is it these people want? Wikipedia provides this synopsis of their goals:

  • We have a shared vision of change – creating a world that is fit for generations to come.
  • We set our mission on what is necessary – mobilizing 3.5% of the population to achieve system change – using ideas such as “momentum-driven organizing” to achieve this.
  • We need a regenerative culture – creating a culture which is healthy, resilient and adaptable.
  • We openly challenge ourselves and this toxic system – leaving our comfort zones to take action for change.
  • We value reflecting and learning – following a cycle of action, reflection, learning, and planning for more action. Learning from other movements and contexts as well as our own experiences.
  • We welcome everyone and every part of everyone – working actively to create safer and more accessible spaces.
  • We actively mitigate for power – breaking down hierarchies of power for more equitable participation.
  • We avoid blaming and shaming – we live in a toxic system, but no one individual is to blame.
  • We are a non-violent network – using non-violent strategy and tactics as the most effective way to bring about change.
  • We are based on autonomy and decentralization – we collectively create the structures we need to challenge power. Anyone who follows these core principles and values can take action in the name of RisingUp!”

Dangerous, dangerous ideas and eerily similar to the basic tenets of democracy, a concept many Americans falsely believe to be the foundation of the United States system of government. You can learn more about the Extinction Rebellion and lend your name in support of its goals at its website.

George Monbiot Speaks For Us All

The Extinction Rebellion has prompted an opinion piece by Guardian columnist George Monbiot. His writing is so clear, so cogent, and so compelling that it defies being condensed, so it is presented in its entirely below.

Had we put as much effort into preventing environmental catastrophe as we’ve spent on making excuses for inaction, we would have solved it by now. Everywhere I look, I see people engaged in furious attempts to fend off the moral challenge it presents.

The commonest current excuse is this: “I bet those protesters have phones/go on holiday/wear leather shoes.” In other words, we won’t listen to anyone who is not living naked in a barrel, subsisting only on murky water. Of course, if you are living naked in a barrel we will dismiss you too, because you’re a hippie weirdo. Every messenger, and every message they bear, is disqualified on the grounds of either impurity or purity.

As the environmental crisis accelerates, and as protest movements like YouthStrike4Climate and Extinction Rebellion make it harder not to see what we face, people discover more inventive means of shutting their eyes and shedding responsibility. Underlying these excuses is a deep-rooted belief that if we really are in trouble, someone somewhere will come to our rescue: “they” won’t let it happen. But there is no they, just us.

The political class, as anyone who has followed its progress over the past three years can surely now see, is chaotic, unwilling and, in isolation, strategically incapable of addressing even short-term crises, let alone a vast existential predicament. Yet a widespread and willful naivety prevails: the belief that voting is the only political action required to change a system. Unless it is accompanied by the concentrated power of protest — articulating precise demands and creating space in which new political factions can grow — voting, while essential, remains a blunt and feeble instrument.

The media, with a few exceptions, is actively hostile. Even when broadcasters cover these issues, they carefully avoid any mention of power, talking about environmental collapse as if it is driven by mysterious, passive forces, and proposing microscopic fixes for vast structural problems. The BBC’s Blue Planet Live series exemplified this tendency.

Those who govern the nation and shape public discourse cannot be trusted with the preservation of life on Earth. There is no benign authority preserving us from harm. No one is coming to save us. None of us can justifiably avoid the call to come together to save ourselves.

I see despair as another variety of disavowal. By throwing up our hands about the calamities that could one day afflict us, we disguise and distance them, converting concrete choices into indecipherable dread. We might relieve ourselves of moral agency by claiming that it’s already too late to act, but in doing so we condemn others to destitution or death.

Catastrophe afflicts people now and, unlike those in the rich world who can still afford to wallow in despair, they are forced to respond in practical ways. In Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Malawi, devastated by Cyclone Idai, in Syria, Libya and Yemen, where climate chaos has contributed to civil war, in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador,, where crop failure, drought and the collapse of fisheries have driven people from their homes, despair is not an option. Our inaction has forced them into action, as they respond to terrifying circumstances caused primarily by the rich world’s consumption. The Christians are right: despair is a sin.

As the author Jeremy Lent points out in a recent essay, it is almost certainly too late to save some of the world’s great living wonders, such as coral reefs and monarch butterflies. It might also be too late to prevent many of the world’s most vulnerable people from losing their homes. But, he argues, with every increment of global heating, with every rise in material resource consumption, we will have to accept still greater losses, many of which can still be prevented through radical transformation.

Every nonlinear transformation in history has taken people by surprise. As Alexei Yurchak explains in his book about the collapse of the Soviet Union — Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More — systems look immutable until they suddenly disintegrate. As soon as they do, the disintegration retrospectively looks inevitable. Our system — characterized by perpetual economic growth on a planet that is not growing — will inevitably implode.

The only question is whether the transformation is planned or unplanned. Our task is to ensure it is planned, and fast. We need to conceive and build a new system based on the principle that every generation, everywhere has an equal right to enjoy natural wealth.

This is less daunting than we might imagine. As Erica Chenoweth’s historical research reveals, for a peaceful mass movement to succeed, a maximum of 3.5% of the population needs to mobilize. Humans are ultra-social mammals, constantly if subliminally aware of shifting social currents. Once we perceive that the status quo has changed, we flip suddenly from support for one state of being to support for another. When a committed and vocal 3.5% unites behind the demand for a new system, the social avalanche that follows becomes irresistible. Giving up before we have reached this threshold is worse than despair: it is defeatism.

Today, Extinction Rebellion takes to streets around the world in defense of our life-support systems. Through daring, disruptive, nonviolent action, it forces our environmental predicament on to the political agenda. Who are these people? Another “they”, who might rescue us from our follies? The success of this mobilization depends on us. It will reach the critical threshold only if enough of us cast aside denial and despair, and join this exuberant, proliferating movement. The time for excuses is over. The struggle to overthrow our life-denying system has begun.

The Political Consequences Of Dissent

Powerful words! They incorporate much of the philosophical underpinnings upon which CleanTechnica was founded more than a decade ago. Stirring words! And if you agree with them and choose to actively support Extinction Rebellion, what can you expect?

Arrest and jail time. Loss of employment. Physical harassment by white males carrying tiki torches. Perhaps being run over and killed by a speeding vehicle. Water cannon. Armed riot police with tear gas and rubber  bullets. Attack dogs. Still want to join the Extinction Rebellion? Better be prepared to find yourself on someone’s No Fly list.

George Carlin said it best — America is an oil company with an army. If you choose to protest, don’t think for moment it will be easy. In fact, it may be downright dangerous. Isn’t it interesting that those who dare to stand up for the Earth are subject to arrest and imprisonment but those whose actions threaten the extinction of the human race are rigorously protected by virtually every government? Scary times ahead, people. Better buckle up.

 
 





Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Rhode Island and anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. His motto is, "Life is not measured by how many breaths we take but by the number of moments that take our breath away!" You can follow him on Google + and on Twitter.



Back to Top ↑