Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Exelon, one of America's largest electric utilities, is opposed to the Trump maladministration's plan to roll back the EPA rule that limits how much mercury coal generating stations can introduce into the environment. Good for them!

Clean Power

Exelon Opposes Trump Mercury Rule Rollback

Exelon, one of America’s largest electric utilities, is opposed to the Trump maladministration’s plan to roll back the EPA rule that limits how much mercury coal generating stations can introduce into the environment. Good for them!

The Trump war on the American people continues unabated. It now includes a plan to roll back a rule that went into effect in 2012 limiting the amount of mercury that coal generating stations can release into the environment. You might think that Exelon, one of the largest electricity generators in the country, would embrace such a rollback, but in fact its representatives met with EPA officials on November 1 to oppose the rollback plan.

Exelon and mercury rule

According to a report in The Guardian, “The investments made in response to [the mercury limitation rule] have provided good paying jobs while also supporting employment in mining, transportation, distribution and other industries, including in the coal industry. Repealing [the rule] would itself eliminate jobs or inhibit job creation,” the company told the EPA. As part of its submission to the agency, it included an analysis supporting its position provided by ADA Carbon Solutions which argues the EPA “should leave [the rule] unaltered.”

Exelon services more than 10 million customers all across the United States, It has annual revenues of around $34 billion and employs more than 34,000 people. Its corporate headquarters is in Chicago. It is also the largest operator of nuclear power plants in the United States.

It argues that weakening the rule on mercury emissions could eliminate a number of jobs, especially in the South where coal-fired generating plants are prevalent. It would also waste billions of dollars that have already been invested to comply with the current rule. It says the rule as presently written has had “substantial” health and environmental benefits. Despite the hue and cry from the industry about how expensive it would be, the rule has cost only a small fraction of what was originally anticipated, Exelon says.

In 2012, the Obama administration changed the way the EPA calculates the economic impact of its environmental rules. It required the agency to consider not only the cost to industry but also the costs to society. Most people know by now that mercury is a health hazard. According to the World Health Organization:

  • Exposure to mercury – even small amounts – may cause serious health problems, and is a threat to the development of the child in utero and early in life.
  • Mercury may have toxic effects on the nervous, digestive and immune systems, and on lungs, kidneys, skin and eyes.
  • Mercury is considered by WHO as one of the top ten chemicals or groups of chemicals of major public health concern.

The energy sector furiously opposed the mercury rule when it was promulgated by the EPA in 2012. It challenged the rule in court but lost in the DC Circuit Court. It should be noted that one member of that court who dissented from the majority opinion is the newest member of the US Supreme Court.

Arizona-solar-legislation-from-Koch-brothers-and-ALECThe EPA’s new plan, which is to strip out any economic and health benefits to the community from its rule making process, is further evidence of how the Trump administration is operating much like a criminal conspiracy.

It is widely believed the rollback of the mercury rule is being proposed solely to please one of Trump’s largest campaign donors, Robert Murray, head of the largest privately owned coal company in America. Murray has ready access to the White House and allegedly whispered in Trump’s shell-like ear after he was elected that it would be awfully nice if the mercury rule was watered down.

Furthering the conspiracy notion is Andrew Wheeler, the acting head of the EPA. He was once a lawyer in a firm that represented Murray Coal. Reasonable people could conclude that the US government is now committed to enriching one wealthy campaign donor at the expense of citizens who need protection from rapacious behavior by corporations that endangers their health and that of their children.

The mercury rule rollback has a dangerous corollary. If in the future the EPA is only permitted to consider the economic impact of its proposed rules on industry and is barred from taking economic and health impacts on the citizens of the country into account, the EPA can overlook those factors in all its rule-making activities. As such, it will become nothing more than a servant of corporations. That hardly seems to square with the notion of a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” which is ostensibly why the United States was created in the first place.

Kudos to Exelon for pushing back against the “government for sale to the highest bidder” policies of the Trump maladministration.

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. 3000 years ago, Socrates said, "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new." Perhaps it's time we heed his advice.


You May Also Like


Can electric vehicles benefit from the US Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) scheme? Reuters reports that it is highly likely that they can. It appears...

Fossil Fuels

Enough methane gas leaks from pipelines between Permian wellheads and processing facilities to power 2.1 million homes, a study published Tuesday in Environmental Science...


What test should courts use to determine whether the Clean Water Act applies to EPA-designated wetlands? The answer could have significant implications for the...

Air Quality

In christening a new office of environmental justice, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan proclaimed Saturday that “underserved and overburdened communities are at the forefront of our...

Copyright © 2022 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.