#1 cleantech news, reviews, & analysis site in the world. Subscribe today. The future is now.


Cars

Published on August 11th, 2018 | by Carlo Ombello

0

If Tesla Short Burn Is Short Burn Of The Century, Can’t Say Elon Musk Didn’t Warn Them

August 11th, 2018 by  


As a preface to a wonderful article by Carlo Ombello, this is one of my favorite comments about this week’s mind-bending stock market reaction to Tesla/Elon Musk, coming to us from “jhm” on the Tesla Motors Club forum: “I do think that Musk has turned the disbelief of all things Elon against the shorts. Musk tells them how he will blow up their position, and they laugh. They will display defiance and dumb disbelief even as the building collapses around them.” — Zach Shahan


Originally published on opportunity:energy.

Tesla shorts may be in for a treat, as Elon Musk has just set the stage for an unprecedented “burn of the century.” By now, everybody knows that Tesla’s CEO set Twitter and financial media on fire this Tuesday as he revealed his plan to make Tesla private, withdrawing it from the stock market at a guaranteed $420 per share, or 20% over the price at the time of the announcement.

Importantly, Musk also clarified that funding for the buyout is already “secured” — a crucial, jaw-dropping detail which implies tens of billions of dollars would be ready to change hands should the deal go ahead.

Such a bombshell announcement could not go unnoticed, as was the case for last week’s anticipated Q2 earnings call that saw Tesla shares skyrocket by about $50 in one day, to ~$350. Musk’s Twitter following is over 22 million people, which means within seconds — via smartphone notification — I knew, journalists knew, everybody knew. The stock market reaction was wild, as could be expected, sending shares near all-time highs just below $380 by day end, after dramatic trading hours and a temporary suspension.

The jump was also helped by prior news from the Financial Times on the same day about Saudi’s recently acquired stake of 3–5% in the company, seen as a big sign of confidence in the company. (Could the two consecutive pieces of news be related? Too early to say.)

It’s just the latest chapter in the years’ long poker game that has seen Musk winning several hands against Tesla shorts, but with no final knockout. This time, though, we may be witnessing its final stages as Elon goes all-in on his challenge to shorts. Given the stakes at hand, it’s hard to anticipate an outcome that won’t see either party compromised in the end.

If you don’t believe Musk’s intentions are true, as Tesla shorts would, simply go on and read what any major financial news outlets are saying — you’ll get a fair idea of the skepticism surrounding the plan. To sum it up: it’s almost impossible. Not only that, but the whole Twitter-storm must have been an unchecked spur-of-the-moment thing, one for which he will pay dearly. The SEC has since been asked to investigate Musk’s announcements for potential stock manipulation (interesting thought, coming from typically manipulative shorts). This in turn means that further clarification on the proposal should be expected any day by way of Musk or Tesla’s board, which is indeed scheduled to meet next week about these matters. One thing is for sure — commentators the world over are confused by Musk’s tweets and the shorts they are interviewing don’t even want to ponder the potential consequences of their bets if Elon was indeed telling the truth.

While Musk has been warning against shorting Tesla for years, he’s never been as determined as over the past few months, starting in May (see above tweets), when he quoted reports from S3 Partners showing progressively low supply of stock for shorts to cover, and hinted at an event bigger than VW’s 2008 short squeeze, something I would picture as a financial “Supernova”. All of these warnings, including a following June tweet giving three weeks to shorts — Elon time — before their position would “explode,” have come at a time when the carmaker has successfully ramped up production of its more affordable Model 3, a car now on the verge of becoming the best selling EV in the world. Tesla has also made substantial efforts to turn to profitability. We already know that since Q2, despite an average weekly production rate of just over 2,000 cars per week during that period, Model 3 has already turned to slightly positive margins. Tesla is now guiding over 50,000 units in Q3 (or an average of about 4,000 Model 3s per week) with a 15% gross margin for the Model 3. Musk clarified that, in the absence of external “force majeure” events, the intention is to become profitable from Q3 onwards every quarter, with Model 3 margins increasing to 25% over another six months.

Recent upbeat news on production progress and looming profitability have already helped Tesla stock head higher. This week’s tweets have then set the stage for something much clearer. Musk has now set a minimum threshold for a possible short squeeze at $420. Should the next few days pass without feedback on the plan, Musk will seriously expose himself to severe consequences over his words. Should we instead see confirmation of Elon’s intentions and formal backing from Tesla board, possibly with identified investors for a private plan, shorts will be in for a nasty surprise.

Is it so difficult to fund Musk’s proposal? While certainly unprecedented in its size, this financial operation is not as far-fetched as many are trumpeting. A very good Seeking Alpha article on the subject, “Tesla: How Much Cash Should It Realistically Secure?” (ironic source, I know), elaborates on how such a plan could easily find appropriate financial backing. It’s estimated some $30 billion or less on the line, none of which from the usual banksters. This summary is remarkably similar to the one in a CleanTechnica article by Maarten Vinkhuyzen, “How Musk Could Fund Taking Tesla Private.” Vinkhuyzen separately showed how $0 to $29 billion could suffice, and with plenty of potentially interested parties.

Then what? If Elon Musk has engineered a similar or better deal, Tesla stockholders will know they have an assured value of $420 per share, which is the price the stock will quickly align to as the plan is confirmed. A minimum loss threshold for shorts. As many will hold onto their shares, availability on the market will plummet, while shorts finally scramble to cover 35 million borrowed shares (~25% of the total), bidding for unavailable stock.

What happens next is a wild guess, Elon clearly stated this would be bigger than VW’s famous short squeeze in 2008, which saw shares quintuple in value over a few days (from €200 to €1000). In that case, just 12.8% of the stock was borrowed and needed cover, but that still left some hedge funds obliterated before the stock retraced. So, if Musk has genuinely designed a plan for the squeeze of the century, we may be about to experience a once-in-a-lifetime, astronomical event of epic proportions.

Wanna know someone who got burnt with VW? David Einhorn of hedge fund Greenlight Capital, who has just received a box of short shorts from Elon Musk (er, actually, from real-shorts seller Chubbies). The irony!

For more fun on Tesla stock, you may want to hear what CNBC’s Cramer has to say:

Cramer’s 4 reasons for why Tesla’s shorts are facing an uphill battle with Elon Musk from CNBC.


Support CleanTechnica’s work by becoming a Member, Supporter, or Ambassador.

Or you can buy a cool t-shirt, cup, baby outfit, bag, or hoodie or make a one-time donation on PayPal.






Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

Carlo Ombello is an environmental engineer based in London. He writes about environment, sustainability and green technologies on his blog opportunity:energy.



Back to Top ↑