Edmunds Confirms Tesla Model 3 Braking Distances Have Improved

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

On the heels of the Consumer Reports confirmation that Tesla’s software update for the Model 3 improved braking distances, Edmunds also took to the track to confirm if the change had indeed improved vehicle braking times in other Model 3 vehicles.

Edmunds took to the same track with the same vehicle, the same tires, brake pads, and rotors. The crew was impressed with the difference in braking distances. After hitting 60 miles per hour, Dan Edmunds noted that the braking feel was very different.

The brakes had more initial bite immediately after stomping on the pedal and it wasn’t just a “feeling.” The data showed that braking distances had improved 10 or 11 feet compared to the previous software version. On the old software, Edmunds’ Model 3 stopped from 60 miles per hour in 133 feet … or from 96 kilometers per hour in 40.5 meters if you prefer.

The new software resulted in a braking distance that was 10 or 11 feet (3 to 3.4 meters) shorter. That’s meaningful and speaks to the power of Tesla’s over-the-air updates. On the other hand, as noted by Edmunds, why was this even an issue? Is Tesla putting enough rigor into the pre-production testing of life-critical safety systems like braking in its vehicles? Why do we need an organization like Consumer Reports to flag a safety issue for a company like Tesla that touts the safety performance of its vehicles?

The reality is that Tesla’s vehicles are the safest vehicles on the road and that it is not in spite of its ability to adjust them over time, but rather, it’s Tesla’s ability to update the performance of life-critical safety systems like braking that often make them safe. Traditional automakers historically take much longer to resolve safety issues and even if something like braking could be improved in a vehicle, it would take a visit to the dealership to get it fixed.

How did Tesla even accomplish this? Electric vehicles come to a stop through a partnership between traditional anti-lock braking systems (ABS) and the regenerative braking system that converts the vehicle’s movement into energy with the vehicle’s motor. The logic governing each system and the interplay between them is the software bit. Both systems are governed electronically, which gives Tesla the ability to modify their performance in post-production vehicles.

For more information or to see more about how Edmunds tests cars, check out its YouTube channel.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Kyle Field

I'm a tech geek passionately in search of actionable ways to reduce the negative impact my life has on the planet, save money and reduce stress. Live intentionally, make conscious decisions, love more, act responsibly, play. The more you know, the less you need. As an activist investor, Kyle owns long term holdings in Tesla, Lightning eMotors, Arcimoto, and SolarEdge.

Kyle Field has 1638 posts and counting. See all posts by Kyle Field