Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

When Elon Musk first tweeted out an article of mine some years ago, naturally, I was ecstatic. What was also cool is that it sat at the top of his twitter feed for a few weeks and the only other things he had tweeted in a period or 2–3 months directly related to his companies (my article didn't — it was a more generic solar power article). That's not how Elon tweets today.


Elon, Bruh …

When Elon Musk first tweeted out an article of mine some years ago, naturally, I was ecstatic. What was also cool is that it sat at the top of his twitter feed for a few weeks and the only other things he had tweeted in a period or 2–3 months directly related to his companies (my article didn’t — it was a more generic solar power article). That’s not how Elon tweets today.

When Elon Musk first tweeted out an article of mine some years ago, naturally, I was ecstatic. What was also cool is that it sat at the top of his twitter feed for a few weeks and the only other things he had tweeted in a period or 2–3 months directly related to his companies (my article didn’t — it was a more generic solar power article).

That’s not how Elon tweets today. He tweets all manner of things, often joking or just having fun. He has one of the biggest Twitter feeds in the world for various reasons, but one reason is that he actually tweets company news, breaks stories, and answers questions on Twitter. Another reason may well be that he has fun there, but I’ve thought for several months that he’s toeing a somewhat dangerous line in that regard.

If Elon tweets a story of yours today, it may stay on the top of his feed for just a few hours or even a few moments rather than a few weeks, but it also drives much more traffic than it did a handful of years ago. A lot more people are watching. But that extra activity and extra attention brings with it some extra risk. Tesla is a world leader in large part because of the products it makes, but you’d have to be a fool to not acknowledge that a sizable part of the brand’s success is also due to Elon’s charisma, authenticity, brilliance, cool character, and candid, down-to-earth approach to communications. (See my 2016 article on why Elon is loved so much for plenty more on these topics.) That brand’s success and Elon’s legendary status can always crash, of course, and while I think a bit of fun and “screw the system” works in their favor, I’ve been concerned for months that they’re steering in the wrong direction.

I’ve listened to a lot of conference calls with Elon, but the one last night was a different deal. I don’t recall such an odd break in the analyst Q&A session. He has ended a call or two in an abrupt “that’s enough of this nonsense” kind of way, but I certainly don’t recall a YouTube fan (cool as he is) getting promoted to ask-as-many-questions-as-you-like status while analysts are shamed and forced to impatiently wait for their turn. It was not cool, in my opinion, and Elon could have just as easily (in theory) said, “We’re not going to answer questions on that topic right now, and we’re going to give a few minutes to a retail investor representing 150 TSLA shareholders who hold 63K+ shares ($18M+ of the stock). The questions have been crowdsourced from those investors and others.” Instead, the analysts were cut off rather rudely for asking “boring,” stupid questions and things got … weird.

As someone who is clearly “on Tesla’s side,” I thought, “Well, this looks bad. This is going to turn out bad. WTF?” Analysts were and will remain pissed. Serious people who just want to better understand the story and get whatever info they can get to paint a more complete picture are going to paint the picture without that data but some “hunches” based on how the questions were brushed off. Being nicely told that Tesla isn’t going to share that data is one thing, but being shamed for being boring while trying to do their jobs is another. Their colleagues and clients sympathize with them, and their reactions were super easy to predict. …

“Tesla is screwed.”

“We’re downgrading our guidance on Tesla.”

“What’s wrong with Tesla’s finances that Elon won’t talk to analysts and treats them like that?” (I don’t agree with the underlying assumption there, but it’s a given this is what many people will think.)

“Man, is Elon sane? Is he losing his mind? Is he actually not a cyborg?”

What I think happened, frankly, is that Elon was tired and he brought his Twitter default mode into a quarterly conference call. I think his frustration with a long-standing, misleading, anti-Tesla narrative bubbled up and he took it out on a couple of analysts trying to get their spreadsheets completed and asking questions that he didn’t think were actually important in the grand scheme of things. I think his assumption that “unconventional” and “customer focused” has always worked for him led him to overplay that hand, and I think the result could be pretty shitty.

One analyst who finally got a question in following the YouTube sideshow seemed to be super earnest, compassionate, and teacher-like in trying to explain that the broader financials chit chat isn’t just about day traders — poor communications on these topics can spook investors who really want to back Tesla, think they should, think the business is strong, and side with Elon on almost everything. Those people may have strong faith in the company, but poor communications and overly dismissive, confrontational responses to analyst questions can even spook big supporters. “So, dude, bruh, just be cool and drop us more numbers to play with.” (Not an actual quote, but may as well have been.)

As expected, mainstream media coverage of the call quickly went after Elon and Tesla. (Frankly, in an age of totally fake “fake news” claims from the president of the United States, the press is primed to fight hot shots who demean their work and the work of earnest analysts they know.)

A Bloomberg article title and subtitle:

And here’s a graph title and subtitle from that article:

A CNBC title: “Tesla stock drops as Elon Musk gives bizarre earnings call.” The two bullet-point highlights at the top were damning, but the latter was actually pretty epic in how it threw shade at the end:

  • Tesla stock dropped more than 5% in after-hours trading as executives cut off Wall Street analysts in an earnings call dubbing their questions on Model 3 gross margins “boring.”
  • CEO Elon Musk took several questions, instead, from Gali Russell, a 25-year-old retail investor in Tesla and Youtuber.

MarketWatch’s live blog got nasty, but I’m either unable to find those comments now or they got deleted.

I’m sure there was much more along these lines, and I can only imagine Seeking Alpha right now. Aside from all of the love for Elon, there are a ton of people who hate and envy him as well. He gave them a lot of fuel to play with last night. And to reiterate the point of the helpful analyst at the end, the fire and smoke from burning that fuel could really spook a lot of people who would otherwise support Tesla — including major investors. They may not have enough insight into the company to treat last night’s discussion as a style/personality thing, instead of a sign that shit doesn’t look good in Fremont.

We’re planning an article that pushes back on the mainstream media obsession with misleading Tesla financials claims and narratives, but man, it gets hard to change people’s understanding and overall opinion on this after a call like last night’s.

The humor is great. The fun is great. But keep communications balanced. Otherwise, you end up looking like a goofball instead of a thoughtful businessman and CEO. Even better, swing back to the style Seinfeld‘s George mastered so well in the 1990s — always leave on a good joke.

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.


You May Also Like


Why I still love my Model 3 after 3.6 years and almost 100,000 miles. Looking at my Tesla app, my Tesla Model 3 odometer...


As a bright red BYD Atto 3 breaks up the grey Corolla gang in my suburban neighbourhood, the march of the electric vehicle invasion...


EV charging in North America includes CCS and NACS. Ford saying it will add NACS to its cars has increased the tension between the...


Tesla’s annual shareholder’s meeting left some disappointed with margins and a lack of new updates. However, some analysts recently reiterated their “Buy” rating on...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.