Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Cars

Cost of Driving Electric Cars <50% Cost of Driving Gas Cars (US Average)

A common misconception is that electric cars are more expensive than their internal combustion engine equivalents. When looking at the total cost of ownership, this just isn’t the case. Furthermore, Forbes reports: “Electric vehicles cost less than half as much to operate as their gasoline-powered counterparts, according to a study of fuel costs released Thursday by the University of Michigan.”

Originally published on EVANNEX.

A common misconception is that electric cars are more expensive than their internal combustion engine equivalents. When looking at the total cost of ownership, this just isn’t the case. Furthermore, Forbes reports: “Electric vehicles cost less than half as much to operate as their gasoline-powered counterparts, according to a study of fuel costs released Thursday by the University of Michigan.

What were the numbers? It’s reported that, “The average cost to operate an EV in the United States is $485 per year, while the average for a gasoline-powered vehicle is $1,117, according to the study by Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute.”

That said, costs can vary dramatically from state to state skewing the results. However, the study notes that: “in no state is it cheaper to fuel up on gasoline,” compared to charging an electric car.

In fact, in some states the results are especially compelling. For instance, “The difference is greatest in Washington state, where gasoline will cost that average motorist $1,338 [per year], compared to $372 to charge up.”

In addition, there are other cost savings that come with electric vehicle ownership including: “the maintenance cost for electric vehicles [which] has also been found to be lower because they have fewer moving partsno exhaust systemless need for coolingless abrasive braking options, and no need to change oil, fan belts, air filters, timing belts, head gaskets, cylinder heads and spark plugs.”

Tesla Model 3 by Zach Shahan |CleanTechnica

Forbes spoke with Harvard scientist James Anderson who came up with similar findings based on his own comparison. A noted atmospheric chemist, Anderson concludes: “Electric cars are vastly better than internal combustion devices. I mean they are incredibly fun to drive, they’re quick, fast, quiet… [and] they don’t have carbon dioxide spewing out of the back.”

Source: Forbes

 
Check out our brand new E-Bike Guide. If you're curious about electric bikes, this is the best place to start your e-mobility journey!
 
 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Advertisement
 
Written By

Matt is all about Tesla. He’s a TSLA investor, and he loves driving the family's Model 3, Model S, and Model X company cars. As co-founder of EVANNEX, a family business specializing in aftermarket Tesla accessories, he’s served as a contributor/editor of Electric Vehicle University (EVU) and the Owning Model S and Getting Ready for Model 3 books. He writes daily about Tesla and you can follow his work on the EVANNEX blog.

Comments

You May Also Like

Cars

Tesla appears to have begun making the Model Y Long Range in Texas along with a new Standard Range with 4680 battery cells.

Clean Transport

The Tesla CEO's allure transcends his millions of fans and includes other CEOs, who have been drawn to his innovative compensation package.

Cars

Tesla’s Autopilot team recently visited New Orleans for the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s Director of Autopilot Software,...

Cars

BYD is an interesting company. It’s like a very distant, very neglected cousin of Tesla. Tesla and BYD have grown their plugin vehicle production...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.