Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The melting of the Arctic region will very possibly result in a further drying out of California, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Communications.

Climate Change

The Melt Of The Arctic Will Dry California Out, Study Finds

The melting of the Arctic region will very possibly result in a further drying out of California, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Communications.

The melting of the Arctic region will very possibly result in a further drying out of California, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Communications.

To explain that a different way, as the Arctic melts, droughts such as the recent 2012–2016 one in California will likely become much more prevalent — owing to the warming of the Arctic leading to the development of high-pressure atmospheric ridges in the Northern Pacific off of the coast of California, which will steer storms towards Canada and Alaska.

“This has the potential to make a drought very similar to the one we had in 2012 to 2016,” commented Ivana Cvijanovic, an atmospheric scientist at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

“Atmospheric impacts of Arctic sea-ice loss. Shown are the ensemble mean differences (“low Arctic ice” minus control) for December–February (DJF) season. Stippling indicates anomalies that are statistically significant at the 90% confidence level. a Surface temperature anomalies. b Precipitation anomalies (absolute). c Precipitation anomalies (relative). d Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) anomalies (shading) and the high cloud cover anomalies (contours). e 500 hPa geopotential distribution changes. f Stream function changes. Negative cloud cover anomalies in d are indicated with dashed lines.”

As a reminder here, most predictions entail the Arctic becoming largely thawed and free of ice within just the next 2 to 4 decades.

Reuters provides further information: “The recent 5-year drought cost California’s farmers billions of dollars in lost production, slashed seasonal agriculture jobs by the thousands, and spiked electricity bills for residents as hydroelectric systems failed.

“…Modeling by the scientists showed that the loss of sea ice could cause a 10% to 15% decrease in California’s rainfall when considering a 20-year mean, with some years becoming much drier and others becoming wetter.”

It should be realized here that those figures relate only to this study, and only to this particular line of causation. The figures will in practice need to be considered in combination with many other avenues by which California will be drying out over the coming decades — rising temperatures increasing evaporation rates; the disappearance of snowpack in the mountains; etc.

While this study was focused entirely on California, the implications have a much broader scope of relevance.

“Studies like this one imply that it’s not only a problem (for communities in Alaska) and that Arctic Sea ice loss that we expect in the next couple of decades could have massive effects” on Californians and various other people around the globe, Cvijanovic concluded.

Something to consider here — as California seemingly slides ever closer to mass depopulation by climate chaos (for lack of a better way to put it) — is whether some of the billionaires located in the state will at some point attempt large-scale geoengineering efforts rather than pursuing a simple change of residence (if it becomes necessary). There may well be just enough entitlement amongst some of them to do just such a thing. (A note here: I’m aware that cloud seeding is relatively commonplace in California. When I’m referring to “geoengineering,” I’m referring to ideas that are potentially far more dangerous.)

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.


You May Also Like


Who has the most power in America? Oil companies? Political parties? Elon Musk? Nope, nope, and nope. The correct answer is insurance companies. Insurance...


States with decarbonization goals must plan, prepare, and test for long-duration energy storage

Climate Change

LLNL and the Clean Air Task Force have released a new report "Sharing the Benefits: How the Economics of Carbon Capture and Storage Projects...


BMW is stepping up from vehicle-to-grid EV charging to kick vehicle-to-everything (V2X) into gear, with an assist from the California utility PG&E

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.