Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


 
CleanTechnica
A new study from analysis firm IHS Markit has found that the aging US wind energy fleet of turbines will drive increased operation & maintenance spending, with the wind industry spending $3 to $4 billion annually and O&M spending exceeding $40 billion between 2015 and 2025. 

Clean Power

Aging US Wind Energy Fleet Drives O&M Spending

A new study from analysis firm IHS Markit has found that the aging US wind energy fleet of turbines will drive increased operation & maintenance spending, with the wind industry spending $3 to $4 billion annually and O&M spending exceeding $40 billion between 2015 and 2025. 

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

A new study from analysis firm IHS Markit has found that the aging US wind energy fleet of turbines will drive increased operation & maintenance spending, with the wind industry spending $3 to $4 billion annually and O&M spending exceeding $40 billion between 2015 and 2025.

According to new benchmarking study — 2017 IHS Markit Wind O&M Benchmarking in North America: Summary of Key Findings — conducted by IHS Markit and published earlier last month, the North American wind energy industry is aging and will reach an average age of 7 years in 2020, and 14 years in 2030. As such, and unsurprisingly, operation and maintenance (O&M) for the wind energy sector will balloon out to between $3 to $4 billion annually and cumulatively exceed $40 billion between 2015 and 2025.

“The average age of the North American wind fleet will rise from 5.5 years in 2015 to 7 years in 2020, and to 14 years in 2030,” said Maxwell Cohen, senior research analyst at IHS Markit and co-author of the report. 

“Along with that, equipment maintenance and operating costs are increasing significantly, leading operators to focus on performance optimization and cost management. We designed this study to help wind-asset owners compare the performance of their projects against the market as a whole, as well as to help them determine the optimal O&M strategy for their business.

“Though it may seem counterintuitive, first-year start-up costs are quite expensive as problems with new equipment are addressed, then, as projects age, we see a spike in costs for equipment maintenance at about the five-year mark through to 10 years of operation. Some wind installations in California date back to the 1980s, so you have a wide variety of equipment and installations, and there is a real need for some comparative analysis to help the industry assess and manage operations and maintenance costs.”

“The IHS Markit benchmarking analysis includes input from many of the largest wind project owners and operators who asked IHS Markit to fulfill their need for concrete, standardized data and analysis to help benchmark the cost and performance of wind-farm operations,” added Ryan Siavelis, senior research analyst, at IHS Markit, and co-author. “There was a void in the market for this type of analysis.”

The IHS Markit report is based on data from nearly 300 wind projects in the North America, representing 30 GW (gigawatts) and nearly 20,000 wind turbines — around one-third of the market. Project start dates for the projects included in the study range from 1994 to 2016, and turbine data represents over 115,000 turbines-years of operational history. Overall, the North American wind energy sector is made up of over 50,000 utility-scale wind turbines of nearly 100 GW installed in 42 US states and 12 Canadian provinces with an average age of 6 years.

By 2030, IHS Markit expects these numbers to reach over 70,000 wind turbines and 150 GW worth of capacity.

“The age of that capacity in 2030 will make the O&M business very lucrative, which is why so many players are expanding into this sector of the business,” Siavelis said. “We see new entrants from across the value chain competing for wind O&M service agreements. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) including Suzlon, Siemens Gamesa, MHI and Vestas are becoming more active in offering to service turbines manufactured by other OEMs, for example.”

 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

EV Obsession Daily!


I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
 
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
 
Thank you!

Tesla Sales in 2023, 2024, and 2030


Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
Written By

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, and I believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.

Comments

You May Also Like

Cars

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! Welcome to China × Cleantech — May 2021...

Cars

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! Originally posted on EVANNEX. By Charles Morris In this day...

Clean Power

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! This year is the start of another key...

Clean Transport

Even from this short-term crisis, IHS Markit expects no real return to "normal," at least not soon. "However, about one third of the volumes...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.