Autonomous Cars Have Shorter Range Due To High Power Consumption By Computers

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

This article about autonomous cars was first published by Gas2.

Here’s a conundrum for you to consider. Auto industry engineers say the computers needed to make autonomous cars possible use so much electrical power that they actually decrease overall efficiency and limit how far an electric car can go on a single battery charge.

Daimler Bosch autonomous cars partnership

We don’t think of the power to run computers all that often. It all happens in the background. Out of sight, out of mind, as the old saying goes. But according to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, in 2016, 70 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity were needed to run all the servers in the United States.

How much is that? Let’s put it this way: It would take the output from 8 large nuclear power plants or double the amount of energy supplied by all the solar panels installed in the US to provide that much power.

Chip in a few dollars a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to accelerate the cleantech revolution!

We are enthralled by the prospect of cars that can drive themselves, but there is no free lunch. Engineers at BorgWarner say the amount of computing power required for autonomous cars today is equivalent to having 50 to 100 laptops plugged in and running simultaneously.

“We’ve been battling all the time because the governments are always pushing for a few percent improvement every year,” Scott Gallett, vice president of marketing at BorgWarner, said of fuel-economy standards. “This just amplifies that challenge.”

Chris Thomas, BorgWarner’s chief technology officer, estimates a car with Level 4 or Level 5 autonomous driving capability will get 5% to 10% worse fuel economy as a result. That’s a problem in an industry that worries about how many LEDs to use in a brake light because of the impact on fuel economy each one has. “They’re worried about one watt, and now you’re adding a couple thousand,” Thomas said. “It’s not trivial.”

The impact of self-driving technology is especially critical at a time when the auto industry and the government are tussling over future fuel economy standards. A fully autonomous Honda Fit will get 54.6 miles to the gallon in 2025 in the best case scenario, which is more than 5 miles per gallon below the U.S. emissions target, according to BorgWarner. A small pickup or SUV would get 45.8 mpg versus a target of 50.

Everyone from Elon Musk on down thinks the first use of self-driving cars will be for ride-hailing and ridesharing fleets. They envision a flotilla of autonomous cars shuttling people from place to place in the world’s overcrowded cities first. Private ownership of Level 5 cars will come later.

Mary Gustanski, chief technology officer for Delphi Automotive’s powertrain division, thinks all that computing power on board means manufacturers will need to rely on plug-in hybrids rather than pure battery electric cars, at least until chip manufacturers dramatically reduce the power requirements needed to operate the computers.

Sam Jaffe, founder of Cairn Energy Research Advisors, agrees. “They’re going to favor plug-in hybrid EVs, and they’re going to require that extra gasoline engine, both to extend the range to be able to do a taxi type of duty cycle, but also to help mitigate the proportion of the autonomous systems on the battery pack itself,” said Jaffe, whose research and consulting firm specializes in energy storage.

“If you are trying to maximize your utilization” of an autonomous vehicle, a battery-electric car “is really restrictive for your business,” Jim Farley, Ford’s president of global markets, told investors on Oct. 3. He said Ford believes hybrids are “the right tech to start with.”

Nobody (except Tesla) seems to want to build electric cars, yet every auto manufacturer is pushing aggressively to bring self-driving cars to market. Yet those autonomous cars will be a significant drain on overall efficiency and fuel economy, two things that are vital to meeting lower carbon emissions goals. How odd.

It’s a classic case of cognitive dissonance. The technology that will actually reduce emissions is being resisted at every turn. Yet the technology that will make self-driving cars possible actually adds a bit to total emission and is being promoted by all parties.

How to resolve the conflict? Easy. Qui bono, as they used to say in ancient Rome, which translates into, “Who benefits?” That’s another way of saying, “Follow the money.” Automakers foresee enormous profits from operating those fleets of self-driving cars, but see building electric cars as a losing proposition. In the battle between emissions and profits, the outcome is a foregone conclusion.

Source: Bloomberg

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Latest CleanTechnica.TV Videos

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Steve Hanley

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. He is proud to be "woke" and doesn't really give a damn why the glass broke. He believes passionately in what Socrates said 3000 years ago: "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new." You can follow him on Substack and LinkedIn but not on Fakebook or any social media platforms controlled by narcissistic yahoos.

Steve Hanley has 5549 posts and counting. See all posts by Steve Hanley