Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
The pipeline operator Energy Transfer has filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace, Earth First, and a number of other organizations, alleging that attempts to solicit donations and interfere with construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline constituted "eco-terrorism."

Fossil Fuels

Dakota Pipeline Operator Sues Environmental Groups, Alleges Interference Of Pipeline Construction Amounts To “Eco-Terrorism”

The pipeline operator Energy Transfer has filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace, Earth First, and a number of other organizations, alleging that attempts to solicit donations and interfere with construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline constituted “eco-terrorism.”

The pipeline operator Energy Transfer has filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace, Earth First, and a number of other organizations, alleging that attempts to solicit donations and interfere with construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline constituted “eco-terrorism.”

Image by Fibonacci Blue (CC BY 2.0)

In other words, Energy Transfer alleges that the environmental groups in question engaged in “acts of terrorism” and damaged “critical business and financial relationships” — thus resulting in billions of dollars in damages.

To frame that differently, Energy Transfer accuses the organizations in question of “manufacturing a media spectacle” relating to the Dakota Access pipeline, and of approaching the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and “using” it to create an opposition.

Image by Pax Ahimsa Gethen (CC BY-SA 4.0)

In even blunter terms, Energy Transfer alleges that environmental organizations “cynically planted radical, violent eco-terrorists on the ground amongst the protesters, and directly funded their operations and publicly urged their supporters to do the same.”

Reuters provides more: “Energy Transfer is being represented by the Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman law firm, whose founding partner Marc Kasowitz is President Donald Trump’s lawyer.

“Greenpeace said this is the second time Kasowitz’s firm has gone after the group. Last year it represented Resolute Forest Products in a defamation lawsuit brought by the global logging company against Greenpeace. … The case is Energy Transfer Equity LP v. Greenpeace International, 17-cv-173, US District Court, District of North Dakota (Bismarck).”

As a reminder here, the Dakota Access Pipeline began operations in May, though the US Army Corps of Engineers is reportedly now reviewing the project, leaving the door open to a possible change of approval.

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Climate Change

Entergy failed to protect Louisiana’s power grid from Hurricane Ida and many residents suffered from it. The same company is also against microgrids, which...

Climate Change

I saw the tweet below last week and I couldn’t help but notice the irony, the deep irony. First, though, let’s roll through a...

Climate Change

The shortsighted answer of closing borders to refugees and pretending climate change does not exist, or won’t impact those of us living in North...

Cars

In a reply to a tweet by Sawyer Merritt yesterday, Elon admitted that in the case of a $1.5 million settlement suit that related...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.