Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
Anti-cleantech companies, think tanks, politicians, and messengers like to talk a lot about renewable energy and electric car subsidies. Meanwhile, they pretend to think that fossil fuels have gotten no subsidies and continue to get no subsidies. That's absolutely rubbish, but it's more or less something we're going to ignore in this article.

Clean Power

Solar & Wind Subsidies = Less Than $0 In USA … Because Clean Energy Saves Lives!

Anti-cleantech companies, think tanks, politicians, and messengers like to talk a lot about renewable energy and electric car subsidies. Meanwhile, they pretend to think that fossil fuels have gotten no subsidies and continue to get no subsidies. That’s absolutely rubbish, but it’s more or less something we’re going to ignore in this article.

Anti-cleantech companies, think tanks, politicians, and messengers like to talk a lot about renewable energy and electric car subsidies. Meanwhile, they pretend that fossil fuels have gotten no subsidies and continue to get no subsidies. That’s absolutely rubbish, but it’s more or less something we’re going to ignore in this article.

Aside from subsidies, polluting products come with massive “externalities” — extra costs placed on society that are not priced into the product. These externalities include the harm pollution does to our health, the climate, and natural resources we need. There are also externalities related to protecting fossil fuel resources, but we’re again ignoring these costs for the purpose of this article.

This article is focused on just a few externalities and subsidies related to the production of electricity — including the economic costs of premature death from pollution.

First of all, note that a previous study concluded that coal costs the United States economy $140 billion to $242 billion a year. That is far more than all of the subsidies given to solar and wind energy in the last 20 years. Between 1994 and 2009, wind and solar received subsidies totaling $5.6 billion. Adding in roughly calculated subsidies from 2010 through 2016, the total comes to about $31.5 billion.

That means that the health costs of coal in one year exceeded the subsidies given to solar and wind over 22 years by about $110 billion to $210 billion. Of course, that doesn’t equate to direct savings, since renewable energy hasn’t displaced that amount of coal use.

The new study, published in Nature Energy, has calculated the amount of money saved in the US over the last decade by replacing part of our coal use with renewable energy.

Millstein et al. estimated that between 3,000 and 12,700 premature deaths have been averted because of air quality benefits over the last decade or so. Those avoided early deaths and some other human health and environmental benefits have created a total economic benefit between $30 billion and $113 billion from renewables.

Note that the study hasn’t even included avoided health care for non-fatal pollution-caused illness and lost work days.

Coal has dropped from producing over 50% of US electricity 13 years ago to 30% in 2016, in large part because of renewables. The Millstein study concludes that the reductions have at the very least covered the cost of renewable energy subsidies, or may have saved the US economy billions of dollars in averted premature deaths.

Altogether, renewable energy subsidies are basically just offsetting costs of burning fossil fuels — or are even much cheaper than the costs that they help society to avoid. Supporting renewables is a no-brainer. Fighting renewable energy is … well, something very different, perhaps a “warped brainer.”

 

Advertisement
 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Comments

You May Also Like

Cars

By focusing on ways to improve efficiency at its factories, EV brand Polestar has managed to reduce carbon emissions by 6% per car.

Cars

Government rebates, cash for clunkers programs, and congestion fees? New Zealand is doing a lot of things right!

Clean Transport

Ford, Volvo Cars and broad industry coalition appeals to EU to ensure all new cars and vans are zero emissions from 2035 and to...

Climate Change

Those wells need to be decommissioned so that they never again spout emissions. But promising climate action and delivering it are two entirely different...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.