Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

There are lots of good reasons to oppose the Keystone XL pipeline, but in the end, it may never get built because there are a lack of customers rather than because of protests and lawsuits.

Fossil Fuels

Keystone XL Pipeline May Never Be Completed Due To A Lack Of Customers

There are lots of good reasons to oppose the Keystone XL pipeline, but in the end, it may never get built because there are a lack of customers rather than because of protests and lawsuits.

The Keystone XL pipeline has generated more than its share of controversy. Intended to transport oil from the Alberta tar sands in Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast of the United States, the project was stopped by President Obama in his last year in office, thanks in large measure to unrelenting opposition from, the climate activism organization cofounded by Bill McKibben.

Keystone XL pipelineBut the victory was short lived. One of the first thing America’s #FakePresident did after taking office was restart the Keystone XL pipeline with the stroke of the pen and a brusque statement — “The bottom line: Keystone, finished.”

Maybe, or maybe not. The pipeline is, after all, a commercial venture. It needs customers for the oil it will carry. The environmental impact study prepared for the project assumed that the price of oil would never fall below $100 a barrel during its useful life. Today, oil is selling for half that amount. Also, it still needs approval from the Nebraska Public Service Commission, which is scheduled to take up the matter later this year.

Still Up In The Air

The NPSC must decide if the pipeline is in the best interests of the state’s citizens. It plans to complete hearings this month and render a decision by November. The five members of the commission are elected but one thing they are forbidden by law to consider is the safety of the project. Chalk that up to the enormous lobbying power of the Koch brothers and other fossil fuel interests.

In a conference call with investors last week, Paul Miller, president of TransCanada’s liquid pipelines business said, “We’ll make an assessment of the commercial support and the regulator approvals at that time. In the event that we do decide to proceed with the project, we still need probably six to nine months to do some of the staging of the construction crews, et cetera, and that would be followed by about a two-year construction period.”

Hardly a ringing endorsement of the project. In fact, TransCanada is busy beating the bushes, trying to drum up business for its proposed pipeline. Under the best of circumstances, the pipeline won’t be moving any oil before the year 2020. The oil industry is in flux at this moment. The demand for oil isn’t going to disappear any time soon, but the market is being roiled by the advent of electric cars and renewable energy. Finding customers who are willing to sign up for oil shipments in 2020 may be harder than originally thought.

→ Related: The Totally Insane Carbon Bubble

Opposition Continues

And the opposition isn’t going away. This past weekend, landowners and pipeline opponents began a new resistance project called Solar XL, a solar farm situated directly in the path of the proposed pipeline. “Solar XL is about showing what’s possible at a massive scale  — a renewable energy economy that doesn’t sacrifice our communities or our climate,” says Sara Shor, the Keep It In The Ground campaign manager for “Putting solar panels in the proposed path of the Keystone XL pipeline will help power the homes of Nebraskans refusing to give in to the fossil fuel industry’s greed.”

The pipeline is also the target of a lawsuit brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth. The lawsuit argues that the Trump administration violated the National Environmental Policy Act by relying on a three-year-old environmental impact study when it granted a permit to TransCanada.

“The Trump Administration broke the law by arbitrarily approving the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline,” says Anthony Swift, director of NRDC’s Canada Project. “And it ignored public calls to update and correct a required environmental impact statement that should have led to one conclusion: Piping some of the dirtiest oil on the planet through America’s heartland would put at grave risk our land, water and climate. We’re asking the court to put an end to Keystone XL once and for all.”

→ Related: WSJ Coverage of the Carbon Bubble — Slim, Lame, & Misleading

Reality Bites

There are any number of reasons not to complete the Keystone XL pipeline. Oil from the Alberta tar sands is some of the dirtiest available anywhere on earth. And every pipeline is subject to leaks and other accidents that can let that oil escape into the surrounding environment. But how ironic would it be that the thing that finally drives a stake through the heart of this abomination is simply that there are not enough customers to make it commercially viable.  That’s something not even the Tweeter In Chief can change in 142 characters or less.

Source: Think Progress

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Autonomous Drones for Better Farming

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else The Force may lead him. He is proud to be "woke" and doesn't really give a damn why the glass broke. He believes passionately in what Socrates said 3000 years ago: "The secret to change is to focus all of your energy not on fighting the old but on building the new."


You May Also Like

Green Economy

First Presidential Veto Maintains Freedom Of Workers To Consider Material Risks To Their Savings

Climate Change

The longtime civil rights leader discusses his position at the helm of the Sierra Club

Clean Power

Svitlana Romanko traveled to the CERAWeek conference in Houston, but was denied admission. Why are people so afraid of her?

Air Quality

The remarks of Secretary General Antonio Gutterres in a speech to the UN General Assembly called out fossil fuel companies for "scrambling to expand...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.