Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Fossil Fuels

House Strips State Dept. of Cross-Border Pipeline Approval (Think: Keystone XL)

Even though Hillary Clinton is no longer in charge of the State Department, some in the GOP continue to hold a grudge. Which is why they voted to removed the State Department from the approvals chain for pipelines that cross an international border. Hey, it’s petty, but it’s one of the few accomplishments the House can claim so far this year.

Originally published on RedGREENandBlue.

Even though Hillary Clinton is no longer in charge of the State Department, some in the GOP continue to hold a NOKXL postergrudge. Which is why they voted to removed the State Department from the approvals chain for pipelines that cross an international border. Hey, it’s petty, but it’s one of the few accomplishments the House can claim so far this year.

Under the bill, H.R. 2883 (115), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) would get the lead in all approvals of cross-border pipelines like Keystone XL, while cross-border power lines would fall under the Energy Department, as reported by Ben Lefebvre in Politico Pro (via CRES).

Various versions of the bill, have passed the House before, only to die in the Senate. It’s not clear if this one has any better chance of moving forward.

FERC would get a lot more power under another bill that passed the House at the same time, H.R. 2910 (115). That bill would streamline environmental reviews and require other agencies (state, federal, and tribal) to defer to FERC decisions.

It’s not clear what impact, if any, these bills would have had on approval of the KXL pipeline had they been in place during the Obama Administration.

KXL was declared dead last year, but has been brought back to life in zombie form by Trump. Several hurdles remain in its way, including environmental lawsuits and opposition from Nebraska farmers who don’t want it cutting across their land (and potentially spilling millions of gallons of crude into the Midwest’s most important aquifer, which could destroy the economies of 6 states).

Background: Native American and Environmental Groups Sue Over Trump’s Keystone XL Pipeline Permit

More important, with the price of oil mired around $50 a barrel, Alberta’s tar sands oil production is also hugely problematic. It’s simply not cost-effective to produce that particularly nasty and climate-unfriendly petroleum at anything less than around $90 a barrel, and without tar sands oil, there’s no need for the KXL pipeline.

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

Jeremy Bloom is the Editor of RedGreenAndBlue.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

Back in the 1990s, researchers undertook the Human Genome Project, a 13-year journey designed to enable a new era of innovation in medicine. By...

Batteries

What defines sexy? Lots of press. Frequent headlines. Gushing talking heads who should know better. Promises of massive deployment and profits. Glistening Photoshop renders....

Clean Power

Concentrating solar power has had a hard time getting off the ground in the US, but that is not stopping the Department of Energy....

Research

Near-real-time data on avian–solar interactions will help the energy industry understand risks and opportunities for wildlife at solar energy plants. How does an array...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.