Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
Researchers have identified hazards to human health from pollutants in fracking wastewater flowing from treatment plants in western Pennsylvania. Is cheap energy worth poisoning our children for?

Cleantech News

Waste Water From Fracking Pollutes Pennsylvania Watershed

Researchers have identified hazards to human health from pollutants in fracking wastewater flowing from treatment plants in western Pennsylvania. Is cheap energy worth poisoning our children for?

Waste water from fracking has contaminated a watershed in western Pennsylvania with radium, alkaline earth metals, salts, and organic chemicals. Some of the pollutants are associated with changes to the human endocrine system. Others are carcinogens.

fracking waste water studyCheap energy is an article of faith in US national and international policy considerations. Americans are determined to have abundant energy supplies at bargain basement prices even if it kills them — and it just might. Hydraulic fracturing — popularly known as fracking — is a technique used by the oil and gas industry to force reserves trapped deep underground to the surface. The technique involves injecting massive amounts of water under tremendous pressure into the ground to force the oil and gas out.

But what goes in is more than just water. Fracking companies can choose from a wide variety of chemicals they believe will expedite the process and produce more gas or oil.

Josh Fox, the producer of the 2010 movie Gasland, writes on his website,

“Fracking fluid is a toxic brew that consists of multiple chemicals. Industry can pick from a menu of up to 600 different kinds. Typically, 5 to 10 chemicals are used in a single frack job, but a well can be fracked multiple times, and each gas play consists of tens to hundreds of thousands of wells – driving up the number of chemicals ultimately used. Many fracking chemicals are protected from disclosure under trade secret exemptions. Studies of fracking waste have identified formaldehyde, acetic acids, and boric acids, among hundreds of others.”

According to the US Energy Information Agency, fracking now accounts for one half of US oil production and two thirds of natural gas production. In Pennsylvania alone, fracking produces about 1.7 billion gallons of polluted waste water every year. That effluent is treated, then released into the environment. But what is in the waste water is a closely guarded industry secret, made possible by the so-called Halliburton Rule rammed down the throats of the American public thanks to former vice president and oil company executive Dick Cheney.

Researchers at Penn State, Colorado State, and Dartmouth College wanted to quantify what impact that waste water has on the local watershed and so the team took core samples downstream from two waste water treatment plants in western Pennsylvania. The team, led by professor Bill Burgos, found elevated concentrations of radium, alkaline earth metals, salt,s and organic chemicals in the sediment samples. The fact that they were found in together in the same strata of the samples suggests they all came from the same source — waste water from fracking operations within the Marcellus Shale formation, which lies partly within western Pennsylvania.

The primary pollutants found were nonylphenol ethoxylates, which are endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are carcinogens. The highest concentrations coincided with sediment layers deposited five to 10 years ago during a peak period of fracking wastewater disposal. Elevated levels of radium were also found as far as 12 miles downstream of the treatment plants.

Some may read this report and carp that the contaminated sediments were the result of activity a decade ago. But that misses the point. The harm done by fracking and other fossil fuel exploration may not be known for decades. Fracking is a direct threat to human health. Is cheap energy worth the harm it can cause to ourselves, our children, and future generations? For too many Americans, the answer is an enthusiastic “Yes!”

Source and graphic credit: American Chemical Society Journal via Science Daily

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Florida or anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. You can follow him on Twitter but not on any social media platforms run by evil overlords like Facebook.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

In-road, wireless EV charging is one way to make electric vehicles more affordable and avert the impending EV charging apocalypse.

Fossil Fuels

Pennsylvania children living near unconventional oil and gas (UOG) developments at birth were two to three times more likely to be diagnosed with leukemia...

Clean Power

Fixed solar array fields are one of the easiest and lowest maintenance ways to create grid electricity from the sun. No moving parts, no...

Clean Power

Annual U.S. Energy and Employment Report (USEER) Shows Strength in Clean Energy Jobs WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) this week...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.