
By Zachary Shahan
As I’ve said or written many times, if you look at all the factors closely, solar energy, wind energy, electric cars, and other clean technologies are already better consumer options than the dirty norms we are used to — not even considering the broad societal benefits of stopping global warming and cutting air and water pollution.
But until this is the case for everyone and is also obvious to everyone, we have work to do. On the cost side of things, one sensible solution would be to pull subsidies from these overripe fossil fuel industries. Unfortunately, pulling subsidies is one of the hardest things for politicians to make themselves do — especially when they get millions of dollars from the industries those subsidies support. On the flip side, some politicians and governments have tried subsidizing cleaner options, but these efforts are limited in scale and scope, come with their own political challenges, and do not adequately compensate for externalities of fossil fuels, let alone the externalities plus the many institutionalized fossil fuel subsidies.
One “clean” solution is simply putting a price on carbon pollution. Of course, any carbon pricing policy has to get the backing of a broad range of politicians, and while “simply” may not be the correct word, it is still within the realm of possibility. One nonprofit focused on the hard, time-consuming, and critically important legwork to make this happen is Climate XChange*. Based in Massachusetts and blessed with a more progressive populace than the average state, the people leading Climate XChange believe that they can make Massachusetts a carbon pricing leader, and then use that success to grow the cause in other states, nationwide, and perhaps to other nations.
In particular, Climate XChange is pushing for two carbon pricing bills that are currently pending in the State House.
S.1821 proposes a fee on carbon pollution in which 100% of the revenue is rebated back to households and businesses. H.1726 similarly levies a fee on carbon, with 80% of the revenue going straight to households and employers, and the other 20% to “green infrastructure investments in transportation, clean energy, and protection against the impacts of climate change.”
In other words, consumers don’t get hit with higher overall costs with such a program (they get cash back) — but pollution is still discouraged by making fossil fueled technologies less competitive than clean technologies.
The work seems like something to support no matter what, but the bonus that could push you over the edge to support this organization is that you can potentially win a fully loaded Tesla Model S or Model X (plus have the taxes paid for you) or another sweet prize. The winning tickets will be drawn on July 4th, 2017. Here are more details on the prizes:
- Grand Prize: an awesome Tesla Model S sedan or Model X SUV @ $120,000 PLUS Climate XChange pays the federal income tax of $40,000 for your prize, so you don’t have to! In other words, the grand prize is worth a jaw-dropping $160,000.
- Amazing 2nd & 3rd prizes: Climate XChange helps you buy an early Tesla Model 3, with a reservation, deposit, cash, and a federal income tax payment!
- The 4th place winner will take home $2,000.
- The 5th place & 6th place winners will each take home $1,000.
You do have to be a United States resident to win, but not to donate to the organization!
*This post was supported by Climate XChange
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...