Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Autonomous Vehicles

US Judge Sends Waymo’s/Google’s Case Against Uber To Prosecutors

Following publicly reported indecision on the matter, the US judge presiding over Waymo’s/Google’s lawsuit against Uber for trade-secrets theft has now reportedly decided to request that prosecutors investigate the claims made by Waymo/Google.

Following publicly reported indecision on the matter, the US judge presiding over Waymo’s/Google’s lawsuit against Uber for trade-secrets theft has now reportedly decided to request that prosecutors investigate the claims made by Waymo/Google.

Notably, though, the judge in question, US District Judge William Alsup, stated in the order on the matter that “he takes no position on whether prosecution is warranted,” as reported (and worded) by Reuters.

Here’s more from that coverage: “Uber declined to comment on the referral to prosecutors, as did a spokesman for Waymo. [Anthony] Levandowski’s criminal lawyer, Miles Ehrlich, didn’t immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on the referral sent after regular business hours. … Alsup’s referral of the case to federal prosecutors complicates the litigation for Uber, said Jim Pooley, a Silicon Valley intellectual property lawyer who isn’t involved in the case. ‘There’s an implication that the judge sees something serious enough that it deserves the attention of authorities to consider whether a crime has been committed,’ Pooley said.”

For those of us not fully briefed on the differences between a civil case and a criminal case, Pooley provided a short summary of the importance here in terms of the process. “Uber’s lawyers have considerable influence over the civil case, and could settle it, he said. ‘The potential for an actual criminal proceeding makes it that much more difficult to control, or affect the ultimate outcome of the dispute.’ … Waymo had asked the judge to effectively shut down Uber’s program to keep it from using the allegedly stolen secrets. In an order issued Thursday that was sealed from public view, Alsup partly granted and partly denied Waymo’s request for a preliminary injunction, without elaborating.”

Altogether, what this means is that an actual trial in open court is looking increasingly likely. Such a trial would likely take place sometime later this year. That would certainly make for an interesting spectacle, wouldn’t it?

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

Cars

In the last year or so, Uber has been making progress on electrifying the driver-owned or driver-rented fleet. As part of its global commitment...

Autonomous Vehicles

It has happened, a class action lawsuit has been filed regarding Tesla Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot, and Full Self-Driving Capability. The people suing argue that...

Cars

A colleague of mine was recently in London. He told me that he estimates that about 75% of his Uber rides on this latest...

Autonomous Vehicles

In the past, I’ve written several times about the attention problem with advanced driver assist systems. The fundamental problem is that when you aren’t...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.