The standard way of estimating air and climate pollution originating from Canada’s oil sands operations vastly understate the reality of the situation, according to a new study from the Canadian government.
To put a figure to that assertion, the study found that actual air and climate pollution from Alberta’s oil sands operations may be up to 4.5 times higher than officially acknowledged.
Oil sands disaster in eastern Alberta. Image Credit: Kris Krug (some rights reserved)
The new findings essentially show something that most impartial observers would probably be able to guess anyways — the energy industry greatly under-reports its actual emissions; and, actual greenhouse gas and air pollution measurement via satellites and airplanes is far more accurate.
Considering that fact, it’s a bit interesting that government agencies in the US and a Canada both rely on estimates provided by the energy industry itself to determine national greenhouse gas emissions … hence one of my many reasons for being very skeptical of the claim that economic activity and greenhouse gas emissions have “decoupled.”
Climate Central provides more: “The Canadian research team measured emissions of volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, in the air above oil sands operations in Alberta. VOCs, most of which are not greenhouse gases, have an indirect effect on the climate. They produce ozone, which is a greenhouse gas and can harm human health.
“Ozone can allow methane to linger longer in the atmosphere than it would under normal conditions. The longer methane, which has about 86 times the power of carbon dioxide to warm the globe over the span of 20 years, remains in the atmosphere the more it helps to warm the climate. …
“The team found that VOC emissions rates from oil sands production were between 2 and 4.5 times the levels companies reported, depending on the location.”
Notably, the researchers are now working on a separate analysis focusing solely on greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands operations.
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
