US Judge: Waymo Doesn’t Have Smoking Gun Showing Uber Conspired To Steal Trade Secrets
Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Help us produce all of the high-quality, original content we publish week after week despite the challenges of content-scraping AI, antisocial media, inflation, and other hurdles.
As we previously reported, Waymo/Google is currently in the process of suing Uber for the alleged theft of trade secrets by a former engineer who left to found the self-driving semi truck startup Otto, which was subsequently acquired by Uber.
In relation to this, Waymo/Google had requested that a US judge issue an injunction blocking Uber from continuing to test its self-driving vehicle tech. It turns out, though, that the evidence provided by Waymo/Google isn’t sufficient to get the injunction granted, according to US District Judge William Alsup.
Judge Alsup stated at the hearing on the matter that he hadn’t seen enough clear evidence to grant an injunction, or rather that he “was wrestling with whether to issue an injunction against the ride service,” as worded by Reuters.
Here’s more from that coverage: “At a hearing in San Francisco federal court, US District Judge William Alsup said it was undisputed that the engineer, Anthony Levandowski, downloaded about 14,000 documents shortly before he stopped working for Waymo.
“If it were proven that Levandowski and Uber conspired in taking Waymo’s information, that could have dire consequences for Uber, say legal and ride-hailing industry experts. … However, Alsup expressed skepticism over whether Uber actually used any Waymo trade secrets. … Waymo attorney Charles Verhoeven said the company suspects such evidence exists. Levandowski declined to answer questions during a deposition, citing his constitutional rights against self incrimination.”
Alsup noted: “I’ve given you lots of discovery, and so far you don’t have any smoking gun.”
On the other hand, Waymo contends that a lot is not being revealed (that should be revealed). “Verhoeven also said Uber was improperly withholding thousands of documents on the grounds that they are confidential legal documents. The judge did not make a ruling from the bench on Wednesday.”
The judge is reportedly still deciding whether or not to send Waymo’s trade secret theft claims to non-public arbitration.
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
