Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Buildings

Smart Growth Study Finds Cities & Suburbs Requiring Too Much Parking Near Transit Stations

Dependency on cars — it’s an ongoing challenge, handcuffs on society. Yet, we continue to load the scale on one side with auto-centric standards that create excessive parking lots covering our urban landscapes. A new study released by Smart Growth America finds that, indeed, there is too much car space from parking lots being built around transit stations. Too many spaces create empty waste on valuable land that could be put to more active use.

“The land near transit stations is a valuable commodity. Hundreds or thousands of people travel to and through these places each day, and decisions about what to do with this land have implications for local economies, transit ridership, residents’ access to opportunity, and overall quality of life for everyone in a community.”

The Washington Post reviewed the study, pointing out: “None of the five transit-oriented developments studied — in Washington, Los Angeles and Oakland, and near Seattle and Denver — generated enough parking to fill even half the number that planning industry standards would have suggested.”

The story — “Cities, suburbs are requiring too much parking near transit stations, study says” — examines the inefficient use of land. In spite of the developments reviewed including fewer parking spaces than those standards recommended, vacant spaces stood out: “Even taking the size down, parking spaces remained empty — between 16 percent and 42 percent empty at peak times.”

Inefficient use of space.

Parking lots drive the cost of building up. Thus, parking lots exclude more affordable housing for those who could really benefit from living near transit. They’re also a clear subsidy for cars in most cases. “Requiring developers to build excess parking, particularly relatively pricey garage parking, makes living near transit more expensive and makes such projects less financially viable for developers, the study said. The demand for homes within walking distance of transit, including in suburbs, far outstrips the supply, which makes them less affordable.”

Check out the full Smart Growth America report.

Related Stories:

The Poor Subsidize Middle Class Free Parking — $440 Million From Car-Free Renters

Town Of Summit (NJ) Using Uber To Relieve Congestion At Train Station Parking Lot

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Cynthia Shahan started writing after previously doing research and publishing work on natural birth practices. (Several unrelated publications) She is a licensed health care provider. She studied and practiced both Waldorf education, and Montessori education, mother of four unconditionally loving spirits, teachers, and environmentally conscious beings born with spiritual insights and ethics beyond this world. (She was able to advance more in this way led by her children.)

Comments

You May Also Like

Buildings

In the second episode of our CleanTech Talk interview with architect, urbanist, and author Bruce Haden, Michael Barnard, Chief Strategist of TFIE Strategy Inc....

Buildings

For Helle Søholt, Founding Partner and CEO of Gehl, there is a global urgency for a people-first approach to planning and to improve people’s...

Autonomous Vehicles

I recently came across some images of the parking lot at Tesla's Fremont (California) facility that seem worth sharing here — as they really...

Clean Transport

The US Federal Transit Administration and Smart Growth America have announced the 5 communities selected to receive technical assistance as part of the National...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.