Published on January 27th, 2017 | by John Farrell0
Video: Choices Within Monopoly — A Grid Of The Future Conversation With Jon Wellinghoff
January 27th, 2017 by John Farrell
Originally published at ilsr.org.
In November 2015, Jon Wellinghoff, former chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, spoke to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission about the grid of the future. In particular, he addressed the issue of giving customers meaningful choices within a monopoly grid model, present in Minnesota and 34 other states. In the following video, he outlines the five key principles for guiding the rules of the 21st century electricity system.
A Time of Change
The first thing Wellinghoff addressed was the changing nature of the electricity system:
We have central station plants around distribution systems that were vertically integrated monopolies that provided reliable, safe, and markedly affordable power for us all. Those are legacy systems that are changing
He noted that electricity sales have leveled off in recent years, a great sign of increasing efficiency but a problem for sales-hungry electric utilities:
It’s very disruptive to utilities. The fact is this efficiency improvement is happening everywhere. Last October, I was in Tuscany walking in a very ancient city at the top of that hill. My wife and I, away from all cares and all technologies, until I saw a street light and I looked up at the street light, it was an LED. There was an LED streetlight in this whole city in Tuscany. I think, “Boy, this technology is going everywhere.”
We’ve seen far more technological innovation within other industries. Wellinghoff suggested that if you drive by a substation, there’s far more evidence of modern technology in your car than in the grid equipment. Other industries saw innovation because,
Competitive forces have created opportunities in [other] industries to advance them, to optimize them, to make them more efficient. We have to figure out how to do this in our electric industry as well.
Providing market mechanisms is important because customers already have a chance to spend their own money to capture energy savings:
It will happen because it’s just money sitting on the table. Question is, where can you go out and get 12% return on your investment on a fairly guaranteed basis over 20 years? Anybody want to take that? Anybody else because … I took it out of my house in Berkeley and I put it to these solar panels on my roof.
The consumers are making these choices. Regardless of what is done on the utility side of the meter, consumers want solar, they’re putting solar in.
Markets Within Monopolies
Wellinghoff began with a discussion of how meaningful market-based mechanisms can be used within monopoly markets like Minnesota. This matters for the 35 states that still have vertically-integrated monopoly utilities, shown below.
He gave an illustration using the map of market prices for MISO, the grid operator for the Midwest. Already, there is a working market for wholesale electricity, pricing electricity based on its availability by location (called the “locational marginal price”). But he suggested another way to view the map:
“If you look at this and then you overlay over this every Walmart in the Midwest. Think about if the Walmarts there could have accessed those market prices what they would have done and how they would have changed the operations in those stores, in those locations where prices were near zero versus where the prices were $200 per megawatt-hour. What they could have done with their operations, their HVAC systems, to have optimized their operation and by doing that, help to optimize the overall market. But right now we don’t have that real interface between the retail market and wholesale market.”
In California, one way to integrate the retail and wholesale levels is with distribution resource planning. They are mapping their distribution grid system just like the wholesale market is mapping the transmission system, and getting granular data on pricing by location.
If you were to put in place market mechanisms that would help consumers put in distributed resources in appropriate locations that these prices can be mobilized and you can optimize the system and lower costs overall.
There’s a big opportunity as customers install their own generation, says Wellinghoff.
We have to…figure out how to coordinate and collaborate between the [wholesale and retail levels] because now that we have distributed resources that are being put in at the consumer level. I believe that those resources should not be isolated by that meter simply for the use by consumers. Consumers should have the opportunity, if they want to, to use those resources for larger grid support for things like voltage and VAR support at a local level, reduction of congestion at the local level.
Electric vehicles are a powerful technological opportunity to serve consumers and the grid simultaneously. Wellinghoff provided an example from the PJM market area in the mid-Atlantic.
If you happen to have an electric car, we should plug that electric car in and charge it and while you’re charging that car …. you can send a signal within the car …to have that car, not only charge, but as it’s charging provide regulation service off the grid. Just like a combustion turbine. In fact, not only just like a combustion turbine, better than a combustion turbine because it can respond instantly to injections in and withdraws out and can do it very quickly and very small increments.
The thing is, you get paid for it. You get paid $5-7 per car, per day. That’s a lot of money. That’s a lot of money you can use to offset the cost of that new Tesla…
Five Principles for “Grid Neutrality”
Wellinghoff wrapped up his presentation with five principles for designing the right rules for the 21st century electric system (you can read more about them here and see how they overlap with ILSR’s principles for Energy Democracy).
- Empower the consumer – give customers the ability to manage their individual energy needs, giving them choices.
- Demarcate and protect the commons – Establish clear boundaries for public and private interest. Consider operating the distribution system as we do the transmission system, with an independent operator.
- Align risks and rewards – allocate risks to those able to accept them, contain the cost of risks to those who take them. Is it better for utilities to deploy voltage control technology, for example, or to allow customers to invest in solar with inverters that does the same, with their own money and receive a rebate for that value?
- Create a transparent, level playing field – promote open standards, data access, and transparency. Provide maps of where value can best be added to the distribution system, for example.
- Foster open grid access – allow anyone who meets basic standards contribute value to the grid, without discrimination.
A Big Opportunity
Wellinghoff wrapped up his presentation with a powerful anecdote of the opportunity and why we sometimes fail to seize it.
If you ask the classic economist, the classic economist will tell you that there no $20 bills laying on the ground, because if there were, somebody would pick them up.
Well here, I’m on the subway, on the BART, going from Berkeley to San Francisco. …I look down on the floor and I see this. It’s a dollar bill on the floor. I look at her, look at the guy in front of me. He looks at me. We all look at each other, but does anybody lean down and pick up the dollar bill? Nobody. Nobody leaned down to get the dollar bill.
We were on that subway for fifteen minutes, and nobody picked the dollar bill
There’s billions of dollar bills laying around in the electric system. Billions of them just laying there to be picked up, but that doesn’t mean that everybody is going to go out there and pick them up. It’s your job and regulators jobs to figure out how to pick them up as most efficiently as possible.