Published on December 19th, 2016 | by Sponsored Content0
Solar + Commercial Energy Storage Provides Effective Hedge Against Uncertainty
December 19th, 2016 by Sponsored Content
By Vic Shao, CEO of Green Charge, an ENGIE Company
By some estimates, 30 percent or more of the typical organization’s non-capital expenditures are attributed to energy costs, making this line item a focal point for cost-management efforts. However, amid technological, regulatory, and political changes in the energy sector, it’s nearly impossible to predict a particular organization’s future energy costs, which hampers decision making. [Full disclosure: this post has been generously sponsored by Green Charge.]
One way to minimize risk in the face of such uncertainty is to hedge against some of the variables in the energy cost equation. Many businesses and public sector organizations are realizing that a judicious combination of self-generated solar PV and behind-the-meter energy storage can greatly reduce overall energy costs while increasing ratepayer control over those costs. To understand how, let’s look at a typical commercial energy bill.
The two main cost components on most bills are energy use charges (measured in kWh) and demand charges (measured in kW). Energy-efficiency programs address the former. Examples include lighting and HVAC retrofits, building upgrades, and renewable self-generation plants, such as solar PV.
The second component is demand charges, surcharges for maximum demand within a billing period. Demand charges can be hefty for non-residential customers, sometimes accounting for as much as 50 percent of an organization’s utility bill. Even after implementing every feasible energy-efficiency program, demand spikes will occur—and demand charges will persist. Over-reliance on solar PV can actually exacerbate the problem. A short period of cloud cover disrupting solar generation during a peak usage event can result in a very costly demand spike.
One way to reduce demand charges is to negotiate a more advantageous rate structure. However, this is only a temporary fix, since the utility may change its rate structures at any time. A less risky approach is to prevent peak usage events from showing up on the utility’s meter. This is one of the functions of a behind-the-meter energy storage system. It can sense peak load events and instantaneously discharge power to cover that demand. The utility meter never registers the peak, so it does not factor into the demand charge.
This is not to say that energy storage is a better cost reduction solution than solar power. While renewables and building retrofits improve energy efficiency, energy storage systems improve power efficiency. When used in concert, they achieve 20 to 50 percent more cost savings than the sum of the savings each solution would achieve alone.
More importantly, they help businesses hedge against a variety of contingencies. For example, the battery can be charged from the solar PV plant so that energy costs are less affected by utility rate increases. That same power can be discharged in the event of solar intermittency, making demand charges less of a worry. Finally, having behind-the-meter storage keeps more of the self-generated energy in house, mitigating the effect of any future net metering restrictions.
Regardless of how the contests play out between utilities, regulators, and other stakeholders, a solar-plus-storage strategy gives commercial ratepayers a significant buffer from risk and more savings.
Interested in learning more about commercial energy storage and solar?
Request a copy of “The Benefits of Solar + Storage for Commercial and Public Buildings.” This white paper takes a more in-depth look at the two technologies and how they can help commercial energy users today.
About the author: Vic is the founder and CEO of Green Charge, the largest commercial energy storage developer in the U.S. Over the course of seven years, Vic grew the company from an idea all the way to successful acquisition in April, 2016 by ENGIE, the largest independent power producer in the world. Prior to Green Charge, Vic held management positions at various enterprise cloud computing companies, including Oracle. Vic holds an MBA from UC Berkeley Haas School of Business and an engineering degree from the University of Virginia.