Disproportionate Fuel Use & CO2 Emissions From Medium & Heavy Trucks (#Charts)
Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Help us produce all of the high-quality, original content we publish week after week despite the challenges of content-scraping AI, antisocial media, inflation, and other hurdles.
In “Fact #951” of its ongoing series on matters related to renewable energy, electric vehicles, emissions, and energy efficiency, the US Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy has highlighted the fact that a disproportionate portion of carbon dioxide emissions and fuel use are the result of medium and heavy truck use.
To explain that, while only around 4% of the total vehicle “population” is a medium or heavy truck, such vehicles are responsible for around 30% of total on-road carbon dioxide emissions and more than 25% of fuel use — mostly owing to the larger sizes and weights of the trucks themselves, the heavier payloads being transported, and the greater distances (at higher speeds) traveled.
Travel at high speeds, especially for vehicles with drag coefficients as low as medium and heavy trucks, is particularly fuel inefficient — travel at lower speeds is, as a result, less impactful with regard to fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions.
To provide figures that are more specific, with an estimated vehicle total of 240 million for cars and light trucks (96% of total), and an estimated vehicle total of 11 million for medium and heavy trucks (4% of total), cars and light trucks accounted for 127 billion gallons of fuel use in 2014 as compared to 44 billion gallons of fuel use that year by medium and heavy trucks.
These figures relate to 1,051 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2014 by cars and light trucks (71% of total emissions that year) and 421 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2014 by medium and heavy trucks (29% of total emissions that year).
These figures are only for the US, it should be remembered — the situation elsewhere will likely be somewhat different but follow the same general point.
Notably, these comparisons don’t take into account buses, motorcycles, or scooters.
Tip of the hat to Bob Wallace for this story.
Image via US Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 10–15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
