Clean Power

Published on November 15th, 2016 | by John Farrell

0

Why Is Green Pricing A Premium When Wind Power Is Cheap?

November 15th, 2016 by  

Originally published at ilsr.org.

Ten years ago, a North Dakota cooperative stopped charging customers a premium for getting energy from the wind, because they found it wasn’t costing anything extra. The cooperative, like many utilities, used a “green pricing” program that allowed customers to voluntarily pay more to get their energy solely from renewable resources. Dozens of utilities still use such programs, and the Top 10 programs alone have over 400,000 utility customer participants.

But with renewable energy at record low costs, why is anyone paying extra?

As an illustration, let’s examine Xcel Energy’s Windsource green pricing program, the 3rd largest in the country with nearly 100,000 participants. It currently charges a premium of $0.85 per 100-kilowatt-hour block of electricity (in Minnesota). In its own words: “For an average home using 800 kWh in a month, that would total just $6.80/month to be 100% Windsource-powered.” Put another way, for the annual output of a single 2-megawatt wind turbine (about 6.1 million kilowatt-hours), Xcel is charging their customers a little over $50,000.

And yet, according to data from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, wind energy provides nearly the cheapest electricity to the wholesale electricity market.

average long term PPA prices for wind power LBNL

In fact, for contracts signed in 2013 and 2014, the average cost of electricity from wind (about 2.5 cents per kilowatt-hour), was the same or lower than the wholesale energy cost for the Upper Midwest, as measured by the regional grid manager, the Midwest Independent System Operator (MISO). And over the next five years, one major power purchase agency forecasts that wind will continue to be as inexpensive as its wholesale market purchases from MISO.

It’s terrific that so many utility customers are willing to pay more for 100% renewable electricity, but it’s also clear that supporting clean energy doesn’t necessarily require paying more, especially in the Midwest. So why do utilities like Xcel Energy still ask us to?

For timely updates, follow John Farrell on Twitter or get the Energy Democracy weekly update.

Photo credit: Sylvan Mably via Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 license)


Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

directs the Democratic Energy program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His seminal paper, Democratizing the Electricity System, describes how to blast the roadblocks to distributed renewable energy generation, and how such small-scale renewable energy projects are the key to the biggest strides in renewable energy development.   Farrell also authored the landmark report Energy Self-Reliant States, which serves as the definitive energy atlas for the United States, detailing the state-by-state renewable electricity generation potential. Farrell regularly provides discussion and analysis of distributed renewable energy policy on his blog, Energy Self-Reliant States (energyselfreliantstates.org), and articles are regularly syndicated on Grist and Renewable Energy World.   John Farrell can also be found on Twitter @johnffarrell, or at jfarrell@ilsr.org.



Back to Top ↑