Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

New Federal Rule Could Speed Renewables Deployment On Public Lands

Originally published on Climate Central.
By Bobby Magill

More wind turbines and solar power plants could be coming to vast tracts of public lands in the West if the Obama administration finalizes a new rule this fall aiming to streamline how federal lands can be developed for renewable energy.


U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and other federal officials inspecting solar panels at the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm on federal lands in California in 2015.

But the rule, hailed by environmental groups and the Obama administration as way to fast-track zero-carbon wind and solar projects on federal lands, is being criticized by the renewables industry, which says it won’t do enough to reduce the cost of developing renewables on public lands.

The federal Bureau of Land Management’s wind and solar leasing rule, first proposed in 2014, is expected to be finalized by the end of October and will create a competitive bidding process to build renewables on federal lands.

Under the rule, the BLM will create incentives for companies to develop wind and solar projects on land that will be prescreened for environmental conflicts so that wind and solar projects can be permitted there more quickly.

The rule is part of the Obama administration’s Climate Action Plan, which seeks to cut U.S. greenhouse gases in part by developing 10 gigawatts of renewable energy on federal land by 2020, or enough electricity to power nearly 5 million homes. Renewables development is critical to keeping global warming from exceeding 2°C (3.6°F) as required under the Paris Climate Agreement.

Helen O’Shea, the western renewable energy project director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco, said the main benefit of the rule is to modernize the wind and solar project permitting process so that the typical years-long environmental review process for new projects on public land can be shaved down to one year or less.

Most renewables, especially wind farms, have been built on private land across the U.S., where there are fewer regulations governing development and construction permits can be easier to obtain.

“The proposed rule would promote the use of preferred areas for solar and wind energy development,” BLM spokeswoman Kimberly Brubeck said.

O’Shea pointed to a solar energy project in Nevada in the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone near Las Vegas that was permitted in about a year as an example of how quickly wind and solar projects on other public lands could be approved. The project was approved within one of 19 solar energy zones which the BLM designated throughout the Southwest as part of its separate Solar Energy Program.

“The rule is a key piece of helping us build the clean energy we need in the right places in a timeline that is going to help us fight climate change,” O’Shea said.

But the wind and solar industries are not convinced.

“We support the intent of the rule — the rule was to develop more renewable energy on public lands,” said Gene Grace, senior counsel for the American Wind Energy Association.

But he said wind developers are concerned about increased fees they will have to pay to the federal government for building wind farms on public lands. Those include a fee the BLM will charge based on a wind farm’s electric power generation capacity, not the actual amount of electricity a wind farm produces.

And, the BLM has yet to designate its preferred areas for wind and solar projects, keeping the wind farm development process slow for the time being, he said.

“The idea of expediting projects on public lands is a good one, but if there’s nothing in this rule that helps wind do it, it’s really not a benefit to us,” Grace said. “The real disincentive to developing on federal land is the time it takes to develop projects. Here, the rule doesn’t help with regard to wind.”

Dan Whitten, vice president of the Solar Energy Industry Association, echoed the wind energy association’s worries, saying the rule makes the costs of leasing federal land unpredictable because rental fees developers are charged varies based on the county the solar farm will be built in and changes periodically.

“The net effect is that companies won’t know how much it costs to develop solar on a given tract of land, and without having a sense of costs, there won’t be a great appetite for investment,” he said. “We hope the final rule will recognize the need for predictability and set rates that offer both fair value to taxpayers and predictability for investors.”

But O’Shea said that the rule will give the wind and solar power industries more predictability, not less, because once the wind and solar development areas are designated, they’ll reduce the environmental conflicts often associated with new developments on public lands.

“The rule is really part of a bigger trend toward modernizing the process for permitting renewables on public lands and putting certainty and stability around it,” she said.

Image: U.S. Dept. of Interior/flickr

Reprinted with permission.


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.


You May Also Like


From ramping up clean electricity to eliminating food waste. From designing cities for walking and biking to preserving ecosystems. Projects that lead to a...

Climate Change

The European Commission attempted to bury news of its last-minute move which jeopardises the EU’s Green Deal and greenwashes fossil fuels, Transport & Environment...

Clean Transport

By Kathy Harris & Patricio Portillo New York is closing out 2021 with a big climate and clean air win — becoming the fifth state in the...

Climate Change

COP26 has ended with empty promises. What else did you expect?

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.