Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Subsidies Done Right — California Solar Initiative’s Success

petition solar power california solar installationTheoretically, subsidies shouldn’t last forever – they should stimulate certain behavior and last long enough to do so but not so long as to suck cash away from taxpayers without purpose.

Unfortunately, that’s often not how things work. Fossil fuels, whose use should be discouraged at this point, continue to get trillions of dollars in subsidies each year. Many other subsidies in various sectors live on like zombies no longer serving their initial, legitimate purpose.

Now, since fossil fuels continue to get subsidies, and their externalities (an extremely costly form of indirect subsidy) are not addressed, I don’t think renewable energy sources or EVs should have their subsidies removed. If fossil fuels someday got priced properly and subsidies got removed, then it would make sense to cut renewable and EV incentives.

Nonetheless, assuming an ideal world in other respects, the California Solar Initiative shows how to do subsidies correctly, and the positive results and evolution of solar in the Golden State. Here are the facts, via Solar Love:

  • 1,750 megawatts — The CSI hit its 2016 target one year ahead of time, achieving 1,753.6 MW by the end of December 31, 2015 (and another 139.7 MW reserved).
  • $10.87 per watt to $5.14 per watt – That’s how much California solar prices dropped from Q4 2008 to Q4 2014 (of course, global factors were a big part of the story here).
  • 5,681 projects, representing 17.2 MW of solar power capacity, have been installed under the Single Family Affordable Solar Homes (SASH) program. (317 more SASH projects are in progress, with a total capacity of more than 1 MW.)
  • 372 projects, representing 24.67 MW of installed capacity, have been installed under the Multi-family Affordable Solar Housing (MASH) program. (214 more MASH projects are in progress or under review, with a total capacity of 38.6 MW.)
  • Despite a loss of rebates for much of 2015, solar installations continued to grow, and that seems to be the case in 2016 again as well.

Now, as I said, since fossil fuels continue to get massive subsidies, I think solar should continue to get direct financial support in California and elsewhere. Nonetheless, there’s some satisfaction seeing a program hit its target, see it get phased out, and see the market continue going strong. Certainly not the pattern we saw with fossil fuels….

Image Credit: Solar power installation on California home via spirit of america /

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.


You May Also Like


The California Energy Commission has chosen Redflow to build a 20 MWh flow battery storage system near the town of Corning.


Who has the most power in America? Oil companies? Political parties? Elon Musk? Nope, nope, and nope. The correct answer is insurance companies. Insurance...


States with decarbonization goals must plan, prepare, and test for long-duration energy storage

Climate Change

LLNL and the Clean Air Task Force have released a new report "Sharing the Benefits: How the Economics of Carbon Capture and Storage Projects...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.