Quotes From Tesla’s SolarCity Acquisition Press Conference

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on TeslaMondo.

Everything below is a direct quote from Musk during the SolarCity acquisition press conference. TeslaMondo just finagled the questions to make the whole thing more readable and conversational.

Will Tesla ever do vehicle-to-grid?

We’ve debated this since the early days of the Roadster. The early proto-Roasters would do vehicle to grid. But you get a lot of complications with that if you back-flow power through the car into the wall, like when is the car allowed to do that, when is it not, and how much do you allow the car battery to be drawn down. And then people will be pretty upset if the lights are on in the house but they can’t drive their car. So I think the right solution is to de-couple it into vehicle, stationary battery, solar.

Could Tesla use SolarCity to skirt auto franchise laws?

It does open up additional options on the retail front. I think we’ll still be prevented from concluding a car transaction.

What’s the overall rationale for this acquisition?

In order to solve the sustainable energy question, we need sustainable energy production, which is going to come primarily in the form of solar — overwhelmingly in the form of solar, in my view — then combine that with stationary storage, and electric vehicles, and you have a complete solution to a sustainable energy future. Those are the three parts that are needed, and those are the things that I think Tesla should be providing.

How did this come about?

It just became increasingly obvious, that as we’re developing the Powerwall and new versions of the Powerwall, particularly as we integrate the inverter electronics and the intelligence of the Powerwall, it really needs to take the solar panels and the solar system into account when doing that — otherwise you duplicate a lot of hardware, and it doesn’t work together as well, it’s more expensive, the installation costs are substantially higher.

An example of synergy?

As you look ahead to Model III, a $35,000 car, that same person at the same moment, we could sell them roughly an equivalent amount of value of solar panels and a Powerwall, effectively doubling, or almost doubling, the sale at that time, and then putting it all in at the same time . . . It’s quite difficult to create an integrated product if you’re forced to be at arm’s length and be two different companies.

It’s absurd to treat SolarCity like a stranger, yes?

If we give a special deal to SolarCity, and SolarCity is not part of Tesla, then why are we doing that? We can do that if SolarCity is part of Tesla. We can’t do it if SolarCity is a separate company.

What’s so enticing about SolarCity, besides your hand in it?

I’d love to talk about what’s going to happen on the product side. That would shed a lot of light on this deal and why I think it makes total sense, really a no-brainer, but I can’t talk about internal, non-public plans . . . While, do date, SolarCity has not been significantly differentiated on the product side, to the solar panels themselves, they certainly will be in fairly near future.

But what about SolarCity’s tenuous financials?

They are headed to cash-flow positive position within the next three to six months at the outside. That’s where the company has been steering itself, reducing their growth rate at some degree to achieve that cash-flow positive position, but they’re very clearly on their way to getting there in short order. So we expect it to be net cash generator, not a user of cash.

Are you trying to change the world or something?

I think you’ll be telling your grandchildren: Yeah, you wouldn’t believe the things we used do. We used to dig up the liquidized remains of dinosaurs and old plants and put them in cars and burn them to move, and did the some thing with power plants. And they’ll be like: That sounds crazy. We’re trying to have the non-weird future get here as fast as possible.

Talk a little more about the integration potential.

What allows us to offer the most compelling product to consumers and businesses? A seamlessly integrated product that always works together — that’s better. You don’t want to have a heterogeneous systems integration problem. That’s basically where the interfaces break down, and people are pointing fingers  saying: This didn’t work — No, your thing didn’t work. If it’s just one integrated system, there’s no finger-pointing. You can iron out all the bugs, and it just works. And you’re not wondering: Should I blame the solar company, or the battery company? It’s a pain in the butt to try to figure that out if you’re the end customer. I think we can guide the integrated product to just be right. To be better.

How big is the solar market?

Only about one percent of US homes have solar. So you have a massive addressable market that’s unserved. That’s at least 40 to 60 million households that could do solar if they wanted to, if the economics were right, and they liked the aesthetics, and it was easy to do, then they would do it. So the future market there is really gigantic.

You sure this won’t slow down Tesla?

From my standpoint, this makes Tesla’s future execution easier, not harder. The Powerwall and Powerpack need to be designed together with the solar system, so it’s a one-piece thing. We really can’t do that if we’re two separate companies.

Cost of sales. What happens there?

Looking ahead to selling Model III, something on the order of a $35,000 car, if we’re selling Powerwalls and solar systems of comparable value and doing so in the same sales footprint, with the same person, our cost of sales should drop in half, as would SolarCity’s correspondingly. Maybe it’s not entirely half, maybe it’s 30 to 40 percent. It’s a very substantial drop on SolarCity’s side and also a material drop on Tesla’s side. You’re basically selling almost twice as much in a single transaction as you otherwise would. And then on the installation setup side, it’s one crew, and one visit, instead of two or three visits. Ongoing maintenance is one point of contact and not two or three points of contact. The cost of the system itself is lower because we’re not duplicating hardware. I think that all makes lot of sense.

What’s the single biggest benefit to Tesla in this acquisition?

The biggest asset that we’d be acquiring are the installers — the installation team of SolarCity, all the people trained in doing the permitting, and the paperwork, and all the complexities that exist in municipalities throughout the country, and understanding how to deal with 37 different roof types, and having efficient logistics infrastructure for doing installations, and then there are some strengths in the SolarCity sales side that we can take advantage of.

Tesla wants to control the world’s energy and grow very large. True?

I think as a combined automotive, power storage and power generation company, the potential is there for Tesla to be a trillion dollar company.

What’s so great about Tesla?

We’re putting a lot of effort into being to being the world’s best manufacturer. And I really mean that. I’m highly confident we will be the world’s best manufacturer. I’ve said we’d build the world’s best car. We did that. At SpaceX, we said we’d build the world’s best rocket. We did that. We’re going to be the world’s best manufacturer, not by a small margin, but by a margin that people don’t even think is possible. I believe in taking a first principles physics-based approach to analysis, and my analysis of the situation is that dramatic improvements are possible, both on the automotive side and on the photovoltaic side.

How is the Gigafactory coming along?

Our engineering team has worked very closely with Panasonic to make dramatic improvements to the cell manufacturing efficiency. We think we’re probably approaching 3x the efficiency of the best plant in the world. That’s pretty good. But there’s room for improvement. Cells are going through that thing like bullets from machine guns. In fact, the exit rate of cells will be faster than bullets from a machine gun . . . Come to the Gigafactory party. It will be an eye-opener.

How are your biggest investors reacting?

It’s interesting to look at the feedback I’ve received since we’ve made the announcement yesterday. Anyone who is product-focused sent me a congratulatory note, sort of a why didn’t you do it sooner sort of message. The people who are finance-focused are a lot more worried about it. In the long run, the value of a company is defined by the value of its products and services. That’s real important to bear in mind. That’s why companies exist. The value of a company will follow the value of the product.

What about working with other solar companies?

Other solar companies would have to match the SolarCity product in order to use our battery product most effectively. It’s not about trying to shut out other solar companies. It’s about guiding the product where it needs to go, and then we’ll do the right thing with other companies if they guide their product to match. We’re not going to be a jerk to other solar companies. This is about being really laser focused on having the most compelling consumer solution.

What about cheap Chinese products?

One advantage of the Silevo technology is that it has significantly higher efficiency than the very low-cost Chinese panels. So on the same surface-area of roof, you can get as much as a third more power. And aesthetically-speaking, the Silevo panels look better. They look a LOT better. And if it’s done right, we can make your roof look better with solar panels than without. This is a night-and-day difference.

The timeline to efficiency gains?

From the point which the deal is done, it should be meaningful and noticeable by the second full quarter after the acquisition is completed. I’m highly confident that will be the case.

Before we close, can you entertain us by talking like an engineer instead of a normal person? Just once, for the kids?

Let’s say somebody’s got a $400,000 house. If you make the roof look ugly, then arguably you’ve made that house worth five percent less, or some non-zero percent less valuable. On the other hand, if you make the roof look beautiful, you’ve made the house more valuable. And maybe that’s PLUS five percent or some non-zero plus percent in the value of the house. If it is something on the order of five percent, then the value delta there is, call it $40,000, or say it’s something like two or three percent, then it’s $20,000. You know, you have quite a big value delta.

TeslaMondo translation: Beautiful solar panels can pay for themselves by boosting home value.

Reprinted with permission.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Guest Contributor

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Guest Contributor has 4312 posts and counting. See all posts by Guest Contributor

18 thoughts on “Quotes From Tesla’s SolarCity Acquisition Press Conference

  • “The Powerwall and Powerpack need to be designed together with the solar system, so it’s a one-piece thing. We really can’t do that if we’re two separate companies.”
    Such things as this are what really bothers me about Musk’s stated reasoning for the deal. Take the Tesla car, does Tesla manufacture all the components of the car or does it work with one or more separate companies to supply Tesla with parts needed for the ‘one-piece thing’ known as the Tesla car? Of course Tesla doesn’t need to own a manufacturer to make a part going into a car as Tesla has dozen of suppliers. Take a look inside your computer or any other manufactured item with multiple components and it’s quite obvious that you can have an integrated product with contracts with suppliers, not needing wholesale ownership of suppliers in order to integrate a product.

    • Perhaps you can compare it a bit to how Apple does business? They outsource the manufacturing part, but they basically design and control everything themselves. That’s a big advantage.

      • Yes, that’s what I’m getting at. Apple doesn’t have to own Foxconn (nor Broadcom, etc) in order to control design to integrate components in it’s products. All these things Musk are saying cannot be done contractually are in fact rather standard in manufacturing and already done by Musk himself with Tesla.

        • I don’t see where Musk is saying that you can’t build parts in different companies and integrate them. He’s saying that someone has to control the design, just as Apple does.

          Apple didn’t suffer the blue screen of death largely because they tightly controlled the software that ran on Apple computers (after their first few years on the market). Windows put no restrictions on what software their computers ran and most of the lockups/crashes were software related. I ran a Windows machines in a business using only about three highly developed software packages (word processing/spreadsheet, payroll, and database) and don’t ever recall seeing the blue screen.

          He’s saying something along the lines of you can’t have one company independently build the steam engine, another the cars and another the railroad and expect them to work well together if there’s not tight design control.

          If another solar panel company wants to use Powerwalls then they need to build to Tesla’s standards. Just like Tesla has made their Supercharger system available to any other company that wants to build their EVs to be compatible with Tesla’s chargers.

          • I basically get paid about $6k-$8k a month from freelancing at home. For everybody looking to complete simple computer-based jobs for several hrs each day from comfort of your home and earn solid income while doing it… Then this gig is for you… SELF40.COM


    • It manufacturer’s a high percentage of content.

      Musk discussed this in other interviews. You can be more innovative if you develop and produce the sub-components that go into your car. You can also innovate the manufacture of your sub-components.

      It’s efficiency and innovation all the way down the pipeline.

      On the other hand, if a supplier can out innovate and out price Tesla, Tesla will buy sub-components.

      • The more you manufacture in house the more of the overall profit you get to keep.

  • “The exit rate of cells will be faster than bullets from a machine gun”


    • He’s likely extrapolating based on daily output divided by minutes of factory operation.

      • I’ve no reason to doubt Mr Musk.

    • Yeah, he needs to stop the gun analogies.
      Otherwise, I have few doubts about this business decision because it’s coming from Musk. Imagine every Tesla store having a SolarCity section for people who’ve never seen or considered it. This would be great in malls if people still go to those. Cross-pollination can work beautifully.

      • exactly. And solarcity has a heavy focus on financing/leasing the cost of the solar panels so I imagine they will be able to show people how to affordably pay for the whole package with monthly payments.. Electric Vehicle, solar system, and stationary battery all for one monthly payment and then help illustrate to you how the savings from other energy/fuel bills will help pay for the entire setup.

        I hope they can pull it off, it really is an amazing future strategy.

        • You forgot the level 2 charger for the car, even if you don’t want to buy the pannels right away, or already have them. Solar city does electrical work. May as well do the charger.

  • Ok, got my attention. With:
    Product roadmap and integration hints
    Manufacturing side with respect to PV and auto
    Beautiful roof comments. (Building integrated PV / PV shingles have never had market viability. I wonder what they plan….)

    Thanks for the article

  • $35k for residential solar. Lol.

    “As you look ahead to Model III, a $35,000 car, that same person at the same moment, we could sell them roughly an equivalent amount of value of solar panels and a Powerwall, effectively doubling, or almost doubling, the sale”

    • I think most of “…solar panels and a Powerwall…” part of the transaction will be financed via a long term electricity billing contract, no?

  • 2 Things I took from that.

    – They are going to integrate the inverters somehow.
    – They are going to make solar panels that are different shapes.

    Both of those things would be awesome!

  • They some how need to compete with just regular roofs. Just skip the shingles and add solar for 20 or 30 percent more. Just had a metal roof put on for 10k. If I could have accomplished the same thing with solar for 15k I would have jumped for it.

Comments are closed.