Clean Power solar xerox printer

Published on April 5th, 2016 | by Tina Casey

10

Xerox Could Blow Open Concentrating Solar Power Field With New Printer

April 5th, 2016 by  

Concentrating solar tech has been getting the stinkeye from some industry observers, with the main beefs being high complexity and high costs compared to conventional solar panels. Nevertheless, the US Energy Department has made a national showpiece out of five gigantic utility-scale thermal solar power plants, and last year the agency threw some grant dollars at Xerox’ cutting edge PARC company to work on the micro-scale, photovoltaic end of the concentrating solar field.

solar xerox printer

#thanksobama For Micro-Solar Tech

The PARC micro-scale concentrating solar project aims at whittling down both the cost and complexity of concentrating solar power, by integrating tiny hexagonal solar elements directly into a flat panel.

The solar elements, measuring 150 x 150 micrometers, were developed by Sandia National Laboratories and can be mass produced using conventional MEMS (microelectronic and microelectromechanical systems) fabrication technology.

Sandia is partnering with PARC on the current project, so group hug for US taxpayers.

CleanTechnica took a look at Sandia’s micro-solar work back in 2009, when it was still under development. The lab was excited about the potential for using the glitter-sized elements to solarize irregular surfaces such as fabrics and roof shingles:

The tiny cells could turn a person into a walking solar battery charger if they were fastened to flexible substrates molded around unusual shapes, such as clothing.

The solar particles, fabricated of crystalline silicon, hold the potential for a variety of new applications. They are expected eventually to be less expensive and have greater efficiencies than current photovoltaic collectors that are pieced together with 6-inch- square solar wafers.

Cheaper Concentrating Solar, Micro-Scale Style

The Sandia micro-solar elements solve one part of the cost problem by using a fraction of silicon to accomplish what a larger chunk would provide in terms of conversion efficiency.

PARC is aiming to reduce the cost of the manufacturing part, and our friends over at MIT Technology Review recently took a look and had this to say:

The new process will build on a larger effort by PARC researchers to invent a new kind of printer that can precisely deposit “inks” made of tiny semiconductor chips, called “chiplets,” by using assembly principles similar to those behind Xerox photocopiers.

Last summer, the PARC research team presented their work at the 42nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

Here’s how they described the manufacturing problem at hand:

Unfortunately, one of the essential and unfavorable scaling factors is the assembly cost due to the many micro-scale components that must be deposited, positioned, oriented, and connected over large areas.

The solution is something that PARC calls a “general, massively parallel, high throughput micro-assembly tool.” The process translates Xerox’ printing expertise into solar manufacturing:

In this digital manufacturing process, the “inks” are micron-scaled PV components that Sandia has developed and the “image” is the micro-CPV module itself.

The team demonstrated enough milestones to win a grant last September from the Energy Department’s cutting edge ARPA-E funding agency, to develop the micro-scale solar printer for commercial application under the agency’s MOSAIC (Micro-scale Optimized Solar-cell Arrays with Integrated Concentration) initiative. 

What Is MOSAIC?

MOSAIC aims to tackle one of the main obstacles for deploying concentrating photovoltaic solar technology throughout more areas of the US. Currently the technology is effective only in the southwest, where direct sunlight is optimal. If the technology could be improved to handle diffuse sunlight (scattered by clouds and other atmospheric conditions), then concentrating rooftop solar panels could become common in a much broader geographic area of the country.

MOSAIC also takes aim at the rooftop solar market from the size angle. Smaller, more efficient panels would make it possible to reach down to smaller roofs, or roofs that are only partially exposed to enough sunlight.

As for the concentrating solar thermal technology projects referenced at the top of this article, the Energy Department seems to be satisfied with its stable of five utility-scale solar power plants for now, but last year it launched a new round of $32 million in funding aimed at bringing down the cost of concentrating solar power to compete with conventional energy, so stay tuned.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Image: Hexagonal solar elements via Sandia National Laboratories.


Check out our new 93-page EV report.

Join us for an upcoming Cleantech Revolution Tour conference!

Tags: , ,


About the Author

specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • Todd

    Each of your articles should just be titled #thanksobama 1, #thanksobama 2, etc.
    I guess we shouldn’t expect any pretense of “journalism” here. What a joke.

    • Larmion

      At least there’s no group hug in the article this time.

      • Todd

        LOL. Maybe she’ll amend the article:
        Update #1: The CleanTechnica staff and I DID get together for a collective group hug at lunchtime after this article was written.

      • Matt

        “Sandia is partnering with PARC on the current project, so group hug for US taxpayers.”
        You either missed it or it got added to keep you happy. 😉

    • DecksUpMySleeve

      Ain’ters gonna Ain’t.

  • neroden

    So what *exactly* do these do? It looks from the press release like they are NOT concentrators (despite the use of the word “concentrating” in the name) — concentrators would have lenses or mirrors to harvest light from all angles, and these appear not to. It looks like these are just tiny solar cells.

    Is there any detail available here? I wish Ms. Casey would do deeper research before publishing articles.

    • JamesWimberley

      The Technology Review article says this:
      “In three years the group must deliver an electrically functional array
      of solar cell chiplets. Such a “backplane” could then be combined with
      miniature optical components that can be made using methods commonly
      used to manufacture large-area optical films used in flat-panel
      displays.”
      So it is a concentrating CSP scheme, eventually.

      Why it should work out cheaper than current cell technology is unclear. You only have so much sunlight hitting a 10cm square catchment area, and CSP doesn’t change that. Technology Review has a long history of subscribing to the mistaken “solar panels are expensive, here’s a hi-tech breakthrough to fix that” mindset.

      In three years the
      group must deliver an electrically functional array of solar cell
      chiplets. Such a “backplane” could then be combined with miniature
      optical components that can be made using methods commonly used to
      manufacture large-area optical films used in flat-panel displays.
      In three years the
      group must deliver an electrically functional array of solar cell
      chiplets. Such a “backplane” could then be combined with miniature
      optical components that can be made using methods commonly used to
      manufacture large-area optical films used in flat-panel displays.
      In three years the
      group must deliver an electrically functional array of solar cell
      chiplets. Such a “backplane” could then be combined with miniature
      optical components that can be made using methods commonly used to
      manufacture large-area optical films used in flat-panel displays.

      • Larmion

        The original authors suggest using their technology for mobile chargers for people like hikers, hunters and soldiers. Satellites and remote sensing equipment are other target markets.

        CPV can be much more efficient in indirect sunlight and improves efficiency per unit of weight and volume. Those are far more important criteria for the target market than pure cost.

    • Larmion

      The way this article is written suggest that the researchers just found a way to increase the amount of collecting area by more precise and efficient
      micro-assembly on irregular surfaces. While that of course increases
      production per unit of surface area, it’s not the same as concentrating
      solar (in concentrating solar, some sort of optical element concentrates
      light from a larger area on a small solar cell).

      However, if you look at the original source, you see that the title is correct – sort of. The inventors of the tiny ‘glitter’ solar cells suggest that they could be combined with micro-lenses to make flexible, small scale CPV units (though they can of course also be used as regular standalone cells).

      Xerox apparently came up with a cheaper, better way to assemble the glitters – with or without matching tiny concentrators.

      • neroden

        Thank you for explaining. The matching tiny concentrators are currently hypothetical, I guess.

        Let me know when they get the tiny concentrators working.

Back to Top ↑