Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Pick My Solar Picks On California Solar Initiative Data

pickmysolar-q2-2015The online solar marketplace Pick My Solar has released its own report on the California solar market after finding “large discrepancies” with the data from the California Solar Initiative (CSI).

According to Pick My Solar, the average cost-per-watt data from CSI is off by 39%, at least partly due to what it calls “exhausted utility solar rebates” that have kept the CSI data out of date.

“The statistics the CSI is looking at are limited for the most part to where utility rebates still remain. Many third-party owned systems that are reported to CSI are based off of bloated prices for tax purposes. If homeowners are truly purchasing solar systems at the CSI reported $5.37 per watt [July 15, 2015 update], we’re not doing our job of promoting solar transparency.” – Max Aram, CEO of Pick My Solar

Pick My Solar’s first data report on the California solar market, which covers the second quarter of 2015, was built using data from bids placed on the company’s bidding platform, as well as from bids analyzed through Pick My Solar’s free “quote advising service.” The report found that the average cost of residential solar in the state of California has dropped to $3.60 per watt (down 2.9% from Q1), as opposed to the $5.32 per watt stated on CSI’s statistics page, and an additional drop of 2.5% in cost per watt for residential solar is predicted for Q3.

A few of the other highlights from Pick My Solar’s report:

  • Q4 will probably see a slight increase (3.5%) in cost per watt for residential solar over Q3
  • Bids for solar systems that include PV modules with “higher brand awareness” have a 6.4% higher closing rate, despite the higher cost
  • In Q2, solar installers who bid systems with micro-inverters or optimizers were more than four times as likely to close the deals as those who bid systems with string inverters
  • The average size of a residential solar array increased to about 6.5 kW during the first two quarters of 2015, compared to an average system size of 6.25 kW in 2014
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Derek lives in southwestern New Mexico and digs bicycles, simple living, fungi, organic gardening, sustainable lifestyle design, bouldering, and permaculture. He loves fresh roasted chiles, peanut butter on everything, and buckets of coffee. Catch up with Derek on Twitter, Google+, or at his natural parenting site, Natural Papa!


You May Also Like


The solar industry is facing big changes. Many factors, including high cancellation rates of large purchases, indicate that consumers may not have been fully...

Clean Power

Theoretically, subsidies shouldn’t last forever – they should stimulate certain behavior and last long enough to do so but not so long as to...

Clean Power

Note: We’re trying to get back into helping homeowners who want to go solar and who want to switch to an electric car. That...

Clean Power

Originally published on Solar Love. As we wrote months ago when it launched, Google has a free online service that uses its mapping information...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.